Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(59,753 posts)
55. I'm so sorry you ran into that. I agree that business types, suits, are often both too contemptuous of artists, and
Mon Dec 29, 2025, 07:46 PM
3 hrs ago

terribly resentful/envious of them. I remember producer Rick Beato doing a video some time back about a young band he knew whose very promising first album was messed up by an interfering A&R man. The same thing can happen in all the arts. If the suits have made the decision to invest in talent - if spending a lot of money on that talent seemed like a good idea - then they should get the hell out of the artist's way. They shouldn't let either contempt toward the artist, or some stupid and egotistical idea that that they'll express their own artistic creativity through directing the artist's work, mess everything up. At least not if the artist is staying true to the type of work that led to the business investment in the first place, holding up their end of the bargain.

I saw representatives of the completely misnamed Big Tech lobbying group the "Chamber of Progress" on X a couple of years ago doing all they could to try to turn people against real artists who objected to their work having been stolen to train AI. Trying to make people view real artists as nasty elite "gatekeepers" who didn't want other people to become artists, which is the reverse of the truth. I saw one of these shills for the AI companies, a lawyer, whining that his parents hadn't bought him a guitar when he was young so he never had the chance to become a rock star that those privileged real musicians had (apparently he'd never heard of any real musicians whose families were poor). So that terribly discriminated-against lawyer and AI shill wanted all the unskilled wannabes to know they were being liberated by AI companies, now that AI tools could instantly let them become musicians, visual artists and writers. I'm surprised they didn't have an AI version of We Shall Overcome for their liberation movement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A lot of AI is ridiculously obvious; but some are not. hlthe2b 9 hrs ago #1
Oops, wrong reply mike_c 9 hrs ago #4
I saved my reply to yours, if you want to repost your "don't throw out the baby with the bath water" highplainsdem 9 hrs ago #9
I know. But we have people here who are knowingly posting AI slop as if it's somehow a plus on a highplainsdem 9 hrs ago #6
True -- and I'm pretty confident that was the root purpose of this OP. KPN 7 hrs ago #35
So easy to spot, so awful. I've tried a few YouTube short NewHendoLib 9 hrs ago #2
And those AI-slop documentaries are flooding YouTube now, making it harder and harder to find real highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #16
And a lot of the AI slop that we see on social media PatSeg 8 hrs ago #23
As far as the ones that are less obvious.. mdbl 7 hrs ago #30
That's interesting PatSeg 7 hrs ago #36
Is this video from George Conway real or fake? Renew Deal 2 hrs ago #59
Fake, and it's labeled "Altered or synthetic content" on the video thumbnail, and the YouTube channel highplainsdem 1 hr ago #63
Kick SheltieLover 9 hrs ago #3
Thanks! highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #17
Yw SheltieLover 8 hrs ago #21
K&R. Thanks for your work. WhiskeyGrinder 9 hrs ago #5
You're welcome! Thanks for everything you've posted about this, too. highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #10
r&k MerryBlooms 9 hrs ago #7
Thank you! highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #18
Excellent responses in that thread. progressoid 9 hrs ago #8
I'll Second That! ProfessorGAC 8 hrs ago #13
Hundreds. There should be a link to see more replies when you get to the end of the first batch. highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #19
I Thought I Did ProfessorGAC 8 hrs ago #22
You have to click on her post here highplainsdem 7 hrs ago #24
I Did ProfessorGAC 7 hrs ago #41
Aren't they, though? As much as she upset her own union members and left them feeling betrayed, their highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #14
Generated AI for content is slop...but AI technology is here to stay and will continue to exponentially grow. Melon 8 hrs ago #11
GenAI is a technological dead end, inherently flawed with hallucinations, fundamentally unethical because of highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #12
Microplastics are here to stay as well, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to eat less of them. WhiskeyGrinder 8 hrs ago #15
Right! highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #20
So what? Cirsium 7 hrs ago #26
You can be against anything...like the protest over cars versus buggy's Melon 3 hrs ago #50
Horrible Cirsium 3 hrs ago #52
No it's not. The race for AI dominance is driving all the market volatility we see... Melon 26 min ago #64
No country is going to get to AGI, let alone ASI, building more data centers for genAI, which is the highplainsdem 2 hrs ago #58
Somebody tell Thom Hartman Bobstandard 7 hrs ago #25
Has he changed it recently? Cirsium 7 hrs ago #28
He shouldn't be using AI. It's an insult to real musicians and helps only AI bros. He could ask his highplainsdem 7 hrs ago #40
DU ain't as pro-union as it likes to think it is. LudwigPastorius 7 hrs ago #27
Well, we're all endangered by genAI now, and even if DUers aren't in unions, they need to understand highplainsdem 7 hrs ago #33
Opposing that bill didn't have anything to do with being anti-union EarlG 7 hrs ago #37
Thanks for explaining! Just googled the date for that and it was back when caregiving and highplainsdem 6 hrs ago #42
I disagree, and I'm not going to argue , but I will say... LudwigPastorius 6 hrs ago #43
I'm not opposed to meaningful legislation that would stem the tide of copyrighted works online EarlG 5 hrs ago #46
As I've told other DUers who were professional musicians, we'd love to hear your music, if you highplainsdem 1 hr ago #61
SOPA awful though Polybius 1 hr ago #62
Thanks Cirsium 7 hrs ago #29
You're very welcome! Thanks for the reply! highplainsdem 6 hrs ago #44
What worries me The Madcap 7 hrs ago #31
It's insane for companies to risk their own data that way. But I've never seen as much hype to highplainsdem 6 hrs ago #45
Feel like we should bring back the un-rec experiment nilram 7 hrs ago #32
Why would you want to unrec a post about how union members and supporters feel about AI slop? If highplainsdem 7 hrs ago #34
Wasn't clear: wanting to unrec AI slop, not this thread. nilram 4 hrs ago #48
Thanks for explaining! I'm relieved to hear that's what you meant. highplainsdem 3 hrs ago #51
Kicked for visibility. Seems our species denial of unintended consequences KPN 7 hrs ago #38
Thanks! And I agree that entirely too many people are unable to see or deliberately ignoring all the highplainsdem 5 hrs ago #47
I have earned my living... GiqueCee 7 hrs ago #39
I'm so sorry you ran into that. I agree that business types, suits, are often both too contemptuous of artists, and highplainsdem 3 hrs ago #55
Would that the subject matter be in a glass jar, controlled. cachukis 4 hrs ago #49
I'm outraged... WarGamer 3 hrs ago #53
I'm amused that you think that's a good reply countering what all those people were saying. But hey, highplainsdem 2 hrs ago #56
No way to block it on here, is there? TommyT139 3 hrs ago #54
A forum just for posting AI slop and talking about how wonderful AI is would be an even worse look highplainsdem 2 hrs ago #57
Block what? Renew Deal 2 hrs ago #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you support unions (DU...»Reply #55