Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Emrys

(8,923 posts)
22. What BS yourself. Nobody has to "worship" a celeb to be opposed to mendacious hate campaigns.
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 05:46 PM
20 hrs ago

You know what's weird? Someone who's apparently consumed by hate about someone they''ll almost certainly never meet, who has at most an infinitesimal impact on their life circumstances, and doesn't even know they exist. Reddit, for instance, seems to be a magnet for such people. On DU, we generally try to reserve those sorts of emotions for the real bastards in this world who are seriously hurting others, and there's no shortage of them.

Since you seem not have bothered surveying the ruins of your threads from yesterday, I'll take the liberty of quoting in isolation FascismIsDeath's rebuttal and correction of your caricature of the study on the wealthy and flight ecological impacts you referred to, since you didn't deign to reply to him:

You should've actually read the study (that you didn't even bother linking to)

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-025-02325-x#Sec5

Here is a sentence in the "Discussion" section of the study that essentially summarizes everything I said..

"Wealth-based emissions comprise private consumption and investment in capital formation across production sectors that supply goods and services consumed by society. Recognizing the associated unequal warming contributions can inform policy interventions."

And a few paragraphs later...

"Similarly, the warming attributable to the investments of the wealthy underscores the need to realign financial flows to meet global climate goals32. This is particularly relevant for the wealthiest 1% and 0.1%, whose transboundary contributions to worsening local extremes arise primarily through investments, rather than consumption."

In other words, its EXACTLY what I said, governments bought and paid for by big money interests... they are saying the exact same thing in this study. The wealthy invested in big fossil fuels and big agriculture and big transportation and manufacturing technologies and they also used their wealth to buy off governments from standing in the way of them profiting from those investments which, as the study says "supply goods and services consumed by society", in other words.... all of us, continuing to buy their shit, mostly because we don't have another choice if we want to continue existing in the modern world.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20896465


No, I can't be arsed going yet another round about the MAGA allegations because they're desperately thin, numerous people responded about those accusations and attempts at guilt by association of yours yesterday and I'd just be repeating what many of them said, and as the article I linked above points out, that sort of well-meaning engagement just ends up promoting the bot bilge anyway.

As someone who proclaimed several times yesterday that this is a discussion forum, you don't seem particularly interested in following up that discussion by actually reading and digesting what people bother to reply to you. One might almost be as well conversing with a bot.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

By the end of World War II we had nuclear weapons, relatively small nuclear weapons. Jim__ 23 hrs ago #1
If one goes up at supersonic speeds, all the others go up. Justice matters. 20 hrs ago #23
Yes, and the cure for diabetes is a diet of only doughnuts and candy bucolic_frolic 23 hrs ago #2
and 1 azzwhole to reverse 250 years of progress rampartd 23 hrs ago #3
There are still selfish troglodytes. haele 23 hrs ago #4
Yes, but we used to not listen to them. OldBaldy1701E 5 hrs ago #25
The internet. Used to be, the crazies would have to drive to 'conferences' Volaris 2 hrs ago #27
Yep. OldBaldy1701E 42 min ago #29
This book is really sobering SamuelTheThird 23 hrs ago #5
I heard Taylor Swift is mentioned in Revelations. BannonsLiver 23 hrs ago #8
I apologize SamuelTheThird 23 hrs ago #9
No check that, I heard she's a prize in a Cracker Jack box. BannonsLiver 22 hrs ago #14
I think most of us would settle for your not spreading RW BS from bot farms on DU Emrys 22 hrs ago #15
Straw man argument SamuelTheThird 21 hrs ago #17
Another attempt at dodging from you after your bravura performance yesterday. It'll fare as well. Emrys 21 hrs ago #19
What bs SamuelTheThird 21 hrs ago #20
What BS yourself. Nobody has to "worship" a celeb to be opposed to mendacious hate campaigns. Emrys 20 hrs ago #22
The crisis, when it comes canetoad 23 hrs ago #6
And democracy is not the default setting 31st Street Bridge 5 hrs ago #24
That would only be a temporary solution. BannonsLiver 23 hrs ago #7
Can't supply cat-harsis, but here's... GJGCA 22 hrs ago #10
I'll take it. 3catwoman3 22 hrs ago #16
Humanity will never "straighten out it's act". maxsolomon 22 hrs ago #11
Sad but true... GJGCA 22 hrs ago #13
Foundation Series OC375 22 hrs ago #12
The doctor's orders in "Dracula: Dead and Loving It"... BH liberal 21 hrs ago #18
A WWIII would be the end of humans with all the nukes flying Bayard 21 hrs ago #21
I believe Einstein was quoted as saying: Wounded Bear 4 hrs ago #26
An AI engineered virus is inevitable now I fear Ponietz 2 hrs ago #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does the human race need ...»Reply #22