General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judged now by loyalty to a political leader? No disagreement accepted. [View all]bigtree
(94,701 posts)"That old canard of Bill Clinton, that it is better to be "wrong and strong" than "weak and right" really took hold. And that was a shame. Being "wrong and strong" is dangerous indeed."
It wasn't an admonition to the party to be 'wrong and strong.' It was an admonition to be more forceful about the issues that Democrats advocate and represent. It was also part of his screed in the speech against the messaging of the republican party.
CLINTON: The agents of change lose when there's no dialogue. When people are screaming at each other and they're mad and they're scared, we lose. When people are talking and listening and thinking, we win.
When people feel uncertain, they'd rather have somebody that's strong and wrong than somebody who's weak and right.