Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snot

(11,528 posts)
17. Agreed. Also, many problems implicated here:
Sun Jan 11, 2026, 01:20 PM
8 hrs ago

E.g., there does not seem to be any clear definition of "terrorist," at least not one I'd be comfortable agreeing with; and the process by which someone gets labelled a "terrorist" seems to take place secretly and without any meaningful checks or balances.

I also remain confused about who's got authority over what, especially when it comes to ICE. Do they have the same rights, powers, authorities, duties, as State police, or not? What is the legal hierarchy as to who gets to overrule who?

I have genuine hope that at some point, a few cases are going to get to the US Supreme Court and get decided in a way that will impose at least some limits on what Trump and the feds can do – Trump certainly seems intent on pushing those limits in every possible direction, and I don't believe the S. Ct. is fully committed to enabling totalitarianism. But I hope they start setting limits before it's too late.


Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great post. Unless there's some policy stating that blocking traffic underpants 9 hrs ago #1
They want to control the narrative and make it all go away. Klarkashton 9 hrs ago #2
"She was labelled a "Domestic Terrorist" prior to the event??? Seriously? niyad 9 hrs ago #3
The whole narrative falls apart with the smallest amount of scrutiny sboatcar 9 hrs ago #5
I think the what the OP meant to say was that she was labeled a domestic terrorist Ocelot II 9 hrs ago #6
No, the OP specifically said "prior". Rather hard to mix up "prior" and niyad 9 hrs ago #10
My understanding is that the agent gave the video directly to Alpha News, Ocelot II 9 hrs ago #4
"My question is, why was Ross recording the incident in the first place?" ICE has told its agents to record so as to WhiskeyGrinder 9 hrs ago #9
In this case, though, he might have been specifically tasked to record for Alpha News. Ocelot II 9 hrs ago #13
He was hoping the situation would escalate sboatcar 9 hrs ago #11
The video was released to a fascist propaganda site Bok_Tukalo 9 hrs ago #7
I think you're right. I might even go so far as to suggest that he'd agreed in advance Ocelot II 9 hrs ago #12
It ain't that deep. The Trump administration is trying to hamper Minnesota on every front. WhiskeyGrinder 9 hrs ago #8
Right on. We are occupied by hostile forces. Ocelot II 8 hrs ago #15
Yep. And Minnesota has always loomed larger in the right wing's sights for decades, and the opportunity to punish us is WhiskeyGrinder 8 hrs ago #16
trump's regime is lawless period, they do not adhere vapor2 8 hrs ago #14
Agreed. Also, many problems implicated here: snot 8 hrs ago #17
I think it's much simpler than all of the above - Jury poisoning dickthegrouch 7 hrs ago #18
This will never get as far as a jury. The regime will see to it that he's never prosecuted. Ocelot II 7 hrs ago #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A conspiracy theory: Why ...»Reply #17