Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: WTAF, Google?! [View all]

Celerity

(53,840 posts)
5. Google reverses key parental control policy. Teens will now need to get explicit permission to remove a parental
Tue Jan 13, 2026, 09:54 PM
Jan 13
supervision setting.

https://mashable.com/article/google-family-link-parental-controls-turn-off-at-13

Google announced Monday that the company is reversing its longstanding practice of allowing minors supervised by their parents via Family Link to unilaterally opt-out of those settings upon turning 13. Soon, if a teen wants to manage their own account, it require parental approval. A spokesperson for Google told Mashable that the policy goes into effect globally this week.

"These changes better ensure protections stay in place until both the parent and teen feel ready for the next step," Kate Charlet, Google's head of global privacy, safety, and security, wrote in a LinkedIn post about the change.

The Google spokesperson said the new policy had been planned for some time. Still, it was announced soon after an online child safety advocate drew viral attention to the company's previous policy in a viral Linkedin post. As of this story's publication, the post had elicited more than 600 comments and received 375,000 impressions.

Melissa McKay, president of the advocacy organization Digital Childhood Institute, wrote the post after receiving an email notification that her 12-year-old son would soon be able to adjust the parental controls she'd set for him through Google's Family Link product. Mashable reviewed the email, which McKay described as short and vague.

snip

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WTAF, Google?! [View all] buzzycrumbhunger Jan 13 OP
Perhaps it's time to follow Australia's lead, banning children under 16 from having social media accounts. sop Jan 13 #1
corporate profits trump parental decisions Skittles Jan 13 #2
Busy standing guard over school bathrooms.... Jack Valentino Jan 13 #9
you got it Skittles Jan 13 #10
but on the bright side, the same sort of people have been getting voted off of school boards! Jack Valentino Jan 13 #12
I think people have had it with these judgmental fuckwads Skittles Jan 13 #13
And, a story I just recently read about a very recent poll showed that a majority of voters Jack Valentino Jan 13 #16
that's a good example Skittles Jan 13 #19
Sadly not fake Tasmanian Devil Jan 13 #3
Google just reversed its policy: Celerity Jan 13 #6
because they were caught Maru Kitteh Wednesday #23
It's COPPA compliant TheProle Jan 13 #4
Google reverses key parental control policy. Teens will now need to get explicit permission to remove a parental Celerity Jan 13 #5
so they avoided a class action lawsuit -- except for the kids who already followed their directions and turned off orleans Jan 13 #11
Translation: "we got scared by the backlash"! Jack Valentino Jan 13 #17
Hey Google canetoad Jan 13 #7
Hey, they just want to make money!--- Jack Valentino Jan 13 #14
They could have been well loved and still very very rich, but, at least they got rid of the motto vanlassie Jan 13 #18
DISGUSTIPATING Faux pas Jan 13 #8
How many Google execs are in those Epstein files? USS_Dauntless Jan 13 #15
Groomgle anyone? Montauk6 Jan 13 #20
Add another company to the boycott list! BTW, anyone know of any gmail alternatives? Crowman2009 Wednesday #21
Soupy Sales' 'Green Pieces of Paper' Scandal Xipe Totec Wednesday #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WTAF, Google?!»Reply #5