Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(23,065 posts)
7. Why not both?
Sat Jan 17, 2026, 01:07 PM
Jan 17

Sure, have an ongoing impeachment committee investigating Trump’s crimes committed during the first half of his second term.

But remember, he is almost certain to continue committing impeachable offences after the midterms, and some may be so egregious, like invading Greenland, that they simply require immediate impeachment (in the case of Greenland, Don Bacon and I agree that would be an act that would garner enough republican support to remove him). If Dems investigate and fail to impeach for anything, how can that be framed as strong, decisive leadership?

So here is my “have it both ways” suggestion:

Use your suggested framing during the midterms-

: "We're definitely going to investigate all of Trump's crimes to determine whether impeachment is merited."


Then, once Dems take back the house, in addition to passing dozens of laws seeking to reverse the damage of the first two years, (facing a filibuster in the senate or a Trump veto should not deter them) like fully restoring ACA subsidies, they should form the Impeachment Committee and start hearings and investigations.

These hearings and investigations should not only target specific crimes and impeachable offences by Trump, but should also focus on a department by department examination of the impeachable offences by his cabinet. IMO, there should be an impeachment (not just hearings or investigations) of a cabinet official each and every month during 2027.

Start with Noem, then move on to:
Hegseth
Bondi
Kennedy
Rubio
McMahon at Education
Bessent
Vought
Gabbard
Patel
Etc

Stephen Miller although not a cabinet member shouldn’t be exempt from the hearings- make him come in and take the fifth or invoke executive privilege repeatedly, on camera.

Then every 90 days or so, the committee should summarize its findings and file formal articles of impeachment against Trump. The framing should be to “stop the unparalleled corruption and lawlessness of this administration”. The process could move as quickly as Trump’s second impeachment, say four weeks or so.

That would mean the first articles of impeachment would be filed in April 2027, with the first trial ending sometime in May. Then file the second set of articles in August, just before the summer recess, and finish in September. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Put our best, most articulate and passionate Dems on the committee- AOC, Crockett (if she’s still in the house), Raskin, Frost, etc. Throughout the hearings, make sure the suffering of the American people at the hands of the administration is highlighted- “he tore down the People’s house to build a gaudy gold ballroom while millions had their food stamps cut and healthcare premiums tripled”.

My guess is there will be a race for the exits by a number of cabinet members in late 2026-early 2027, but they can still be subpoenaed even if the question of impeachment is moot for them,

Dems must show the courage to impeach because that too is part of their oath to protect and defend the Constitution.

And besides, it’s the right thing to do.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I like how you think, my dear EarlG! CaliforniaPeggy Jan 17 #1
This approach has my vote. lamp_shade Jan 17 #2
Brilliant! mahina Jan 17 #3
I think people are really, really tired of Trump leftstreet Jan 17 #4
Agreed!! And except for Fox - and maybe CBS now - Tadpole Raisin Jan 17 #5
Dems need to expose & investigate. poli-junkie Jan 17 #6
Why not both? Fiendish Thingy Jan 17 #7
My argument is that actually impeaching him again is a mistake EarlG Jan 17 #15
I think a solid drubbing in the midterms might make #4 more likely Fiendish Thingy Jan 17 #26
I Agree... It's a Dead End Waste of Precious Time Cha Jan 17 #61
My thoughts are, TSF would pardon bluestarone Jan 17 #23
Most excellent malaise Jan 17 #8
In the meantime, pray our asses off that he croaks fast. 3Hotdogs Jan 17 #9
I'm beginning to play Swan Lake music for my own morale RockCreek Jan 17 #32
Yep! Scott Alan Swaggerty Jan 18 #72
Agreed, as it's unlikely the Senate would convict. It all relies on winning the House in the midterms surfered Jan 17 #10
Not sure if this is relevant orangecrush Jan 17 #11
Great idea! highplainsdem Jan 17 #12
If he allows the midterms. Blue Full Moon Jan 17 #13
He doesn't have a say in the matter. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jan 17 #27
Great strategy...I can get behind it. MiHale Jan 17 #14
Excellent post and suggestion. We could turn it into our Infrastructure Week. A new story every c-rational Jan 17 #16
I like this approach. Wear them down, wear them out. "AGAIN, you've been screwed by Trump!" each time he does it. CTyankee Jan 17 #18
It's almost tailor made for modern media EarlG Jan 17 #21
Ding ding ding...Bingo. Flood he zone and do not stop. c-rational Jan 17 #41
"Encourage popular podcasters to treat it like a crime drama with a new episode each week." liberalla Jan 17 #44
Ooh, nice. Scott Alan Swaggerty Jan 18 #75
Moscow Mitch leaves office next year ... we need to wait until he's gone FakeNoose Jan 17 #17
His wife resigned on Jan 7th 3021, effective Jan 11th. RockCreek Jan 17 #35
I like it. Sorta like the drip, drip, drip of water torture. Joinfortmill Jan 17 #19
Dem economic plan, economic message, is immediately met with cries of: "Whatabout Impeachment!" "Whatabout ICE!" betsuni Jan 17 #20
There would be nothing to stop Democrats from EarlG Jan 17 #24
well-reasoned - thanks Earl. jmbar2 Jan 17 #22
"It's clear to sane people that Trump is practically committing an impeachable offense per day at this point." mikelewis Jan 17 #25
K&R spanone Jan 17 #28
But would anyone besides MSNOW even cover it? milestogo Jan 17 #29
"But would anyone besides MSNOW even cover it?" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #37
Yes! That will reach HUNDREDS of voters! Wednesdays Jan 17 #62
We refuse to buy our own media because we finger-wag about that putting us "in a bubble" BumRushDaShow Jan 18 #65
Good question! Scott Alan Swaggerty Jan 18 #74
Good logic Earl G. And I didn't expect a conviction in the Senate, UNLESS no_hypocrisy Jan 17 #30
A New Trick gfarber Jan 17 #31
wow quaint Jan 17 #39
I fully agree with this WestMichRad Jan 17 #33
Democrats need to demonstrate they can lead in the right direction. So every time they speak BootinUp Jan 17 #34
"Impeachment Committee that is tasked with conducting a sweeping investigation" BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #36
Right I felt the J6 Committee was extremely effective. yellow dahlia Jan 17 #57
Best idea I've heard in quite awhile. KS Toronado Jan 17 #38
Either way, the Democratic Party continues to have a huge target and "KICK ME" sign on its back. Montauk6 Jan 17 #40
Brilliant idea PLUS it's a great vehicle for recording all his/regime's crimes Wild blueberry Jan 17 #42
Impeachment is a waste of time RetiredParatrooper Jan 17 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author jfz9580m Jan 17 #45
This is great, as far as it goes... scipan Jan 17 #46
I agree that it would need to be a multi-pronged effort EarlG Jan 17 #49
I'm afraid I missed some of your replies. We're in agreement! Nt scipan Jan 17 #51
Great OP BTW. Really got me thinking. I can picture it, and it's kinda beautiful. scipan Jan 17 #54
Imagine some strong legislation to address thre Emoluments Caluse. yellow dahlia Jan 17 #58
A Committee is a great idea mcar Jan 17 #47
Great post (and thanks as always for the great site leadership). But, I still have the same question. OldBaldy1701E Jan 17 #48
I've mentioned in a couple of places in my OP, and in replies EarlG Jan 17 #50
You have a lot more faith in such a thing happening than I do, I guess. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Jan 17 #55
I love the strategy dickthegrouch Jan 17 #52
I have no problem with Dems talking about impeachment... returnee Jan 17 #53
Great idea. Imagine how many more crimes will be perpetrated, yellow dahlia Jan 17 #56
I don't buy into accusations of TDS AZProgressive Jan 17 #59
Agreed... AntiFascist Jan 17 #60
Exactly! "Impeachment is a dead end." TygrBright Jan 17 #63
Yes!!!!! gristy Jan 17 #64
Sort of a Big Beautiful Impeachment Committee... Hugin Jan 18 #66
K & R BobsYourUncle Jan 18 #67
Plus... BobsYourUncle Jan 18 #68
They should also investigate timms139 Jan 18 #69
Absolutely! Scott Alan Swaggerty Jan 18 #71
K&R Scott Alan Swaggerty Jan 18 #70
A realistic approach... kentuck Jan 18 #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some idle thoughts on imp...»Reply #7