Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some idle thoughts on impeachment this Saturday morning [View all]Fiendish Thingy
(22,203 posts)7. Why not both?
Sure, have an ongoing impeachment committee investigating Trumps crimes committed during the first half of his second term.
But remember, he is almost certain to continue committing impeachable offences after the midterms, and some may be so egregious, like invading Greenland, that they simply require immediate impeachment (in the case of Greenland, Don Bacon and I agree that would be an act that would garner enough republican support to remove him). If Dems investigate and fail to impeach for anything, how can that be framed as strong, decisive leadership?
So here is my have it both ways suggestion:
Use your suggested framing during the midterms-
: "We're definitely going to investigate all of Trump's crimes to determine whether impeachment is merited."
Then, once Dems take back the house, in addition to passing dozens of laws seeking to reverse the damage of the first two years, (facing a filibuster in the senate or a Trump veto should not deter them) like fully restoring ACA subsidies, they should form the Impeachment Committee and start hearings and investigations.
These hearings and investigations should not only target specific crimes and impeachable offences by Trump, but should also focus on a department by department examination of the impeachable offences by his cabinet. IMO, there should be an impeachment (not just hearings or investigations) of a cabinet official each and every month during 2027.
Start with Noem, then move on to:
Hegseth
Bondi
Kennedy
Rubio
McMahon at Education
Bessent
Vought
Gabbard
Patel
Etc
Stephen Miller although not a cabinet member shouldnt be exempt from the hearings- make him come in and take the fifth or invoke executive privilege repeatedly, on camera.
Then every 90 days or so, the committee should summarize its findings and file formal articles of impeachment against Trump. The framing should be to stop the unparalleled corruption and lawlessness of this administration. The process could move as quickly as Trumps second impeachment, say four weeks or so.
That would mean the first articles of impeachment would be filed in April 2027, with the first trial ending sometime in May. Then file the second set of articles in August, just before the summer recess, and finish in September. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Put our best, most articulate and passionate Dems on the committee- AOC, Crockett (if shes still in the house), Raskin, Frost, etc. Throughout the hearings, make sure the suffering of the American people at the hands of the administration is highlighted- he tore down the Peoples house to build a gaudy gold ballroom while millions had their food stamps cut and healthcare premiums tripled.
My guess is there will be a race for the exits by a number of cabinet members in late 2026-early 2027, but they can still be subpoenaed even if the question of impeachment is moot for them,
Dems must show the courage to impeach because that too is part of their oath to protect and defend the Constitution.
And besides, its the right thing to do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Agreed, as it's unlikely the Senate would convict. It all relies on winning the House in the midterms
surfered
23 hrs ago
#10
Excellent post and suggestion. We could turn it into our Infrastructure Week. A new story every
c-rational
23 hrs ago
#16
I like this approach. Wear them down, wear them out. "AGAIN, you've been screwed by Trump!" each time he does it.
CTyankee
22 hrs ago
#18
"Encourage popular podcasters to treat it like a crime drama with a new episode each week."
liberalla
21 hrs ago
#44
Dem economic plan, economic message, is immediately met with cries of: "Whatabout Impeachment!" "Whatabout ICE!"
betsuni
22 hrs ago
#20
"It's clear to sane people that Trump is practically committing an impeachable offense per day at this point."
mikelewis
22 hrs ago
#25
We refuse to buy our own media because we finger-wag about that putting us "in a bubble"
BumRushDaShow
5 hrs ago
#65
Good logic Earl G. And I didn't expect a conviction in the Senate, UNLESS
no_hypocrisy
22 hrs ago
#30
Democrats need to demonstrate they can lead in the right direction. So every time they speak
BootinUp
22 hrs ago
#34
"Impeachment Committee that is tasked with conducting a sweeping investigation"
BumRushDaShow
22 hrs ago
#36
Either way, the Democratic Party continues to have a huge target and "KICK ME" sign on its back.
Montauk6
21 hrs ago
#40
Brilliant idea PLUS it's a great vehicle for recording all his/regime's crimes
Wild blueberry
21 hrs ago
#42
Great OP BTW. Really got me thinking. I can picture it, and it's kinda beautiful.
scipan
19 hrs ago
#54
Great post (and thanks as always for the great site leadership). But, I still have the same question.
OldBaldy1701E
19 hrs ago
#48
You have a lot more faith in such a thing happening than I do, I guess. (n/t)
OldBaldy1701E
18 hrs ago
#55