Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Victim Blaming. 2012: the year when it became okay to blame victims of sexual assault [View all]NYC Liberal
(20,453 posts)97. "Just-world hypothesis" explains exactly that.
The just-world hypothesis (or just-world fallacy) is the cognitive bias that human actions eventually yield morally fair and fitting consequences, so that, ultimately, noble actions are duly rewarded and evil actions are duly punished. In other words, the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to, or expect consequences as the result of, an unspecified power that restores moral balance; the fallacy is that this implies (often unintentionally) the existence of such a power in terms of some cosmic force of justice, desert, stability, or order in the universe.
Also the actorobserver bias:
Actorobserver asymmetry (also actorobserver bias) explains the errors that one makes when forming attributions about behavior (Jones & Nisbett, 1971). When a person judges their own behavior, and they are the actor, they are more likely to attribute their actions to the particular situation than to a generalization about their personality. Yet when a person is attributing the behavior of another person, thus acting as the observer; they are more likely to attribute this behavior to the persons overall disposition than as a result of situational factors. This frequent error shows the bias that people hold in their evaluations of behavior (Miller & Norman, 1975). People are more likely to see their own behavior as affected by the situation they are in, or the sequence of occurrences that have happened to them throughout their day. But, they see other peoples actions as solely a product of their overall personality, and they do not afford them the chance to explain their behavior as exclusively a result of a situational effect.
Basically people blame bad actions on the situation or some other extenuating circumstance when it's them, but when it's someone else they ascribe it to some kind of personal character flaw in the other person. Ex: You don't stop to help someone who's fallen, it's because you were late for a really important meeting or some other extenuating circumstance. You see someone else do the same, they're an asshole, they don't care about other people, etc.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Victim Blaming. 2012: the year when it became okay to blame victims of sexual assault [View all]
PeaceNikki
Dec 2012
OP
We've become an ass-backward society wherein victims are often blamed and it cuts across
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#1
We see it here on DU. So much focus is placed on what the VICTIM could/should have done differently
PeaceNikki
Dec 2012
#2
I could not believe what I was seeing on that thread yesterday, on something that is supposed
niyad
Dec 2012
#9
When the only point you discuss is what the victim could have done differently, you're blaming the
PeaceNikki
Dec 2012
#38
and thinking the majority of rape victims are dressed in scimpy outfit or naked is wishful thinking.
seabeyond
Dec 2012
#82
i just cannot take the time to explain why you are so wrong here. comments like these are pretty
seabeyond
Dec 2012
#89
As a woman, I dispute the hypothesis here: women have long been blamed for assaults on them.
s-cubed
Dec 2012
#14
Agree. That's why I added "I don't think it's a new phenomenon or isolated to sexual abuse, either."
PeaceNikki
Dec 2012
#15
I think she's saying that 2012 wasn't 'the year', but that it's always been that way.
PeaceNikki
Dec 2012
#17
i think like with racism, in the earlier decades starting at 80's it was not pc to say this outloud.
seabeyond
Dec 2012
#18
I think you're right. As the generation who fought for equal rights ages, those behind it have no
PeaceNikki
Dec 2012
#21
So Sharia law would well for you? All women keep everything covered up or they are asking for it?
L0oniX
Dec 2012
#72
Definitely!!! I'm absolutely amazed as we move into the 21st century that this backward crap still
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#30
i think the greater fear is the independence and progress women have made and the fear men have
seabeyond
Dec 2012
#19
I think we as Democrats are guilty of this, too. And we should take responsibility to change this.
PeaceNikki
Dec 2012
#28
in the early 2000's my issue was religion and hate on liberals. last couple years it has been hate
seabeyond
Dec 2012
#32
And, for that, you have my utmost respect. I know you're a strong ally in the fight for women.
PeaceNikki
Dec 2012
#35
I think all motivation, and hence control, stems from fear ... and the republicans, ... and the
RKP5637
Dec 2012
#27
women have gained too much freedom and independence. this is the backlash. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2012
#56