Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tritsofme

(19,822 posts)
8. Especially from the minority, whipping is rarely about the substance of the issue and almost always about
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 10:23 PM
22 hrs ago

about the strategic value of the vote.

If withholding votes can plausibly scuttle a bill the party strongly opposes, then a heavy whip effort makes sense.

If the bill is going to pass on Republican votes alone, and there are Democratic members, particularly in Trump-won districts, whose reelections would be materially harmed by a symbolic “no,” then whipping them accomplishes nothing.

In that case, whipping isn’t moral leadership, it’s burning your own coalition for performative satisfaction, and it actively makes future Democratic majorities less likely.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Name an issue worth whipp...»Reply #8