Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OldBaldy1701E

(10,430 posts)
6. I agree with you.
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 04:13 PM
6 hrs ago

But, why only mention the boy in the title? The part that is first to be seen by everyone and informs us as to what the story is about. Why do that?

That was the media drawing you in by insinuating that they 'only' took a boy, so that you will rush to read the article, and even click on the little thing that allows them to access your machine in your haste to find out why they grabbed a solitary little boy off of the street.

The fact that they are taking anyone is inexcusable.

I never said a thing about what they did. Just that the media, once again, has done a disservice to the situation by sensationalizing the title of their article. By doing this, they trivialize the situation and make it more about getting clicks than informing us of what is going on. By not calling them out on it, we allow them the freedom to start twisting facts or even making shit up in the name of revenue.

I am sorry that I was not more clear about this.

There was an Hispanic family living across the hall from us. The apartment was usually filled with the sounds of a happy family: singing, yelling, kids running around. They had two girls and a tiny boy. Five people in a one bedroom. But, they were making it work. I would run into them on occasion. We were just to the point where they would speak and I would as well. The girls would always wave and we would wave back. Nice people.

I have not seen or heard anything from that apartment in two weeks now. The Christmas decoration on the door is still up as is the holiday welcome mat.

You think I am not FUCKING MAD AS HELL about that? I did not even get the chance to be there for them. To offer help or at least a place for their kids to be while that SHIT was going down. I was not able to help my own neighbor. A family with small children. I might've been of use. I was not.

They are just gone.

You want to know what is wrong with me? I am beyond caring about a system that allows this shit to happen. One that allows rich people carte blanche to be deprived and soulless and never suffer a consequence for it. That orange gibbon's rise to power was not a fluke. It was the end result of the tweaking and corrupting that they did to every aspect of our society just to allow such an outcome.

Can I do something about it? Probably not with this screwed up body. I can get in the way by collapsing in front of them, that's about it.

But, I am willing to do it. It is that, or die a useless coward.

That does not appeal to me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Those 4 year old gang members can be quite dangerous. Irish_Dem 16 hrs ago #1
Stealing children for their sexual abuse ring? Clouds Passing 12 hrs ago #2
Misleading. OldBaldy1701E 12 hrs ago #3
Maybe you missed this part of the story Beaverhausen 10 hrs ago #5
I agree with you. OldBaldy1701E 6 hrs ago #6
Asylum applicants. maxsolomon 10 hrs ago #4
POLICE STATE. Sing it out loud. Evolve Dammit 5 hrs ago #7
Last week it was reported that Publix schools were now virtual. n/t aggiesal 5 hrs ago #8
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ICE detains five-year-old...»Reply #6