Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(130,667 posts)
21. A better example would be the Norwegian resistance. It was highly effective
Mon Jan 26, 2026, 12:49 PM
Jan 26

and mostly, though not always, nonviolent, because the Nazis had far superior firepower. One example is the teachers' resistance.

Norway was invaded by the Nazis on 9th of April, 1940. Within two months, the Nazis had crushed Norwegian military resistance and installed a puppet government. Norwegians responded to the occupation of their country both nonviolently and violently. Because of the unprovoked aggression that the Nazis unleashed upon them, many Norwegians felt that all forms of resistance were fully legitimate. However, most saw nonviolent resistance as the only practical option, given the massive military advantage of the occupying military forces. The protests were fueled by the presence of the Nazis and many actions of the occupation government, led by the fascist "Minister-President" Quisling, only increased the size of the resistance. For example, the creation of a compulsory fascist Youth Front led the Bishops of the State Church to resign.

The Teachers’ Defense of Education should be understood as a part of this continual resistance against fascism, which continued up through the liberation of Norway. Quisling and his Nazi backers wished to create a Corporative State, meaning a state where the entire society is geared towards fascist goals. When Quisling attempted to transform the education system for this purpose, the teachers responded with a very successful defense.

Quisling created a new Norwegian Teacher’s Union, to be led by the occupation forces, and required all teachers to join. Almost immediately, an underground group in Oslo sent out a short statement for teachers to copy and mail to the authorities stating their refusal to participate, with their name and address affixed. Between 8,000 and 10,000 of Norway’s 12,000 teachers participated.

The teachers’ action created panic in the Quisling government, and he ordered schools to be closed for a month. This decision sent the school children back home and 200,000 parents wrote letters of protest to the government. In addition, teachers continued to hold their classes in private, defying government orders.
Again, Quisling was outmaneuvered by the Norwegian resistance, and so the occupation government ordered roughly 1,000 male teachers to be arrested and jailed. Underground organizations continued to pay the salaries of the incarcerated teachers, removing financial pressure on the prisoners and striking teachers.

In April the government sent 499 teachers to a concentration camp near Kirkenes, in the arctic. When news of this action was leaked crowds of students and farmers gathered along the tracks to sing and offer food as the train passed. The teachers also formed their own choirs and gave lectures in order to maintain their sanity and pass the time. Around a month after their arrival in Kirkenes, word came in mid-May that the occupation government’s Church and Education Department had given up on creating a fascist teachers’ organization,

Eventually it became clear to Quisling that he would lose whatever legitimacy he had left in the eyes of the population and released the remaining teachers from the concentration camp. Thanks to Norwegian pride and fascist oppression, the people of Norway had solidified into a resistance movement that successfully defended the schools from incorporation into the fascist state. The people would continue to give Quisling so much difficulty that he was ultimately forced to give up on his idea of the Corporative State altogether.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R Solly Mack Jan 26 #1
Really important point on framing jmbar2 Jan 26 #2
Thank you O II. Important info. Clouds Passing Jan 26 #3
I wish. It would be nice to get paid for freezing my butt while waving a sign in subzero weather. Ocelot II Jan 26 #4
DURec leftstreet Jan 26 #5
Thank you Ocelot. murielm99 Jan 26 #6
Minnesota is leading the way peggysue2 Jan 26 #7
Minnesota is WE THE PEOPLE. yellow dahlia Jan 26 #26
Just what we need, "organized resistance" by "super smart, super right people." gulliver Jan 26 #8
Are you here? Do you know what's going on here? Ocelot II Jan 26 #9
What's an objection to my point? gulliver Jan 26 #12
What's happening here is far more than monitoring ICE movements on Signal. Ocelot II Jan 26 #18
Immigration reform would be a healthy thing to do. gulliver Jan 26 #22
"Immigration reform" has been debated for decades and nobody's managed to fix it. Ocelot II Jan 26 #24
"Both sides" nonsense Cirsium Jan 26 #29
Pretti's behavior "a perceived threat"?.... electric_blue68 Jan 26 #30
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 26 #10
I'm not against any of those things. gulliver Jan 26 #13
. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 26 #16
I agree in general gulliver Jan 26 #20
. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 26 #28
You don't seem to understand the reason for Signal monitoring, Ocelot II Jan 26 #19
I'm a systems engineer by training... haele Jan 26 #25
You have more faith in the system than most leftstreet Jan 26 #11
I see the system as really in trouble gulliver Jan 26 #14
What if The System itself is the virus? leftstreet Jan 26 #17
There's no avoiding systems. gulliver Jan 26 #23
What? Cirsium Jan 26 #27
That's true. MineralMan Jan 26 #15
A better example would be the Norwegian resistance. It was highly effective Ocelot II Jan 26 #21
Well that would mean I am a bit safer in my red city Tree Lady Jan 26 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's happening in MN is...»Reply #21