Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
41. What I really find distasteful
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:13 PM
Dec 2012

The claim that those who are "most vulnerable" will be protected. That's the biggest load of bullshit I've ever heard. If you want a program to survive, you tie it to benefits for the middle class. That's political reality in this country. If you don't really give a damn if it fails or not, then you explicitly tie it to the poor. The poor have a weak constituency at best and benefits to them can readily be damned as waste and examples of how the "competitive spirit" are being sapped. When I see proposals like this, I have to conclude that the administration is either stupid or full of shit. There really isn't a middle ground because this really is American politics 101.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Correction: It is National Women's Law Center madfloridian Dec 2012 #1
You an edit your subject line. There is no time limit. Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #28
Thanks, I keep forgetting there is no time limit now. madfloridian Dec 2012 #34
Old people first. Who's next? forestpath Dec 2012 #2
Don't forget this includes veterans. I find it all shameful.. madfloridian Dec 2012 #43
These are not the droids you are looking for MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #3
Thank you. Great info. n/t TDale313 Dec 2012 #4
Thanks. I thought they were very good sources. madfloridian Dec 2012 #6
K&R hay rick Dec 2012 #5
Hey. madfloridian Dec 2012 #9
K&R. No more cuts to SSI period. Hurts too many people. Too arbitrary. Overseas Dec 2012 #7
Good post. It doesn't need to happen. madfloridian Dec 2012 #11
It's Social Security. SSI is Supplemental Security Income which is a disability benefit n/t duffyduff Dec 2012 #38
Finally some truth ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #8
It is indeed true, they like us at each others throats Dragonfli Dec 2012 #13
So you are actually claiming that elderly and sick people equte to 'the rich' and should be treated Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #20
Which part of ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #25
Senator Bernie Sanders: "Do not adopt the so-called Chained CPI." cer7711 Dec 2012 #10
The main person speaking out strongly is an Independent senator. madfloridian Dec 2012 #22
Yep ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #26
We need to have the President's back. CranialRectaLoopback Dec 2012 #12
No, he needs to have our backs for once /nt Dragonfli Dec 2012 #14
Damn right newfie11 Dec 2012 #15
Question on chained CPI Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #16
Yes, benefits will be reduced and the cost of stuff won't. madfloridian Dec 2012 #23
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #27
du rec. nt xchrom Dec 2012 #17
If you have to "soften the blow" then there's a blow there to soften. Right? Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #18
Ah, yes. madfloridian Dec 2012 #19
Even Richard Nixon knew better than to cut benefits: Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #21
Thanks for the Nixon quote. madfloridian Dec 2012 #24
Am I mistaken or do other parts of the government also get the cuts that are called COLA? For jwirr Dec 2012 #29
Maybe. hay rick Dec 2012 #30
I've always wondered why there were any limits on how much you could liberal_at_heart Dec 2012 #31
Thank you. jwirr Dec 2012 #32
It will be other programs as well. I just posted this article...includes veterans, military. madfloridian Dec 2012 #33
k&r Starry Messenger Dec 2012 #35
It will affect veterans. madfloridian Dec 2012 #36
Obama said it himself today. He has agreed to it. madfloridian Dec 2012 #37
the 'fallacy' part is very important Enrique Dec 2012 #39
It's amazing. They will protect the poorest while making the rest of us poorer. madfloridian Dec 2012 #40
What I really find distasteful MFrohike Dec 2012 #41
I find that distasteful as well. Protect poorest, let the rest get poorer. madfloridian Dec 2012 #42
About that "birthday bump" for the oldest and poorest...oh come on! madfloridian Dec 2012 #44
The sentence you don't bold is the more important one: bhikkhu Dec 2012 #45
I didn't bold it because it means nothing at all. Exempt poorest but hurt the rest of us? madfloridian Dec 2012 #46
But raising the cap does the same thing bhikkhu Dec 2012 #47
So you are saying it's fair to hurt those with other income? Those who prepared? madfloridian Dec 2012 #48
In essence, that's what our progressive income tax system does bhikkhu Dec 2012 #49
Right now to me it's all a bunch of baloney. madfloridian Dec 2012 #50
^ Wilms Dec 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»From National Women's Law...»Reply #41