Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bluestarone

(21,668 posts)

15. Ok, let's go a little further her, if you would

Reply to unblock (Reply #14)

Mon Feb 2, 2026, 12:56 PM

Feb 2

What would, could be basis to issue a subpoena? I mean would a meetings with the president then decisions for the president be a reason? Would LARGE GIFTS from people that a judge is deciding their case be one? Would judges requiring NDA's from all their staff be something? If none of these, could you maybe site one that COULD be a reason?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question. Can a supreme court judge [View all] bluestarone Feb 2 OP

i can't imagine why not. then again, i can see this supreme court finding a reason.... unblock Feb 2 #1

Yes i can see this court having trouble with it BUT how could they stop it? Also how about Judge Cannon? bluestarone Feb 2 #3

Separation of powers? yagotme Feb 2 #2

congress can impeach and remove justices unblock Feb 2 #4

Impeachment of a SC judge would be a very high bar, with a highly provable crime. yagotme Feb 2 #6

Whether it's harassment depends mostly on whether it's harassment. unblock Feb 2 #9

Yes, cabinet members and other government officials get subpoenaed all the time. yagotme Feb 2 #11

And? That's no reason for them to be above the law or exempt from normal procedures. unblock Feb 2 #12

Going back to my earlier posts, if you're going to go at the top level, yagotme Feb 2 #13

I agree there should be a high bar and it should clearly be substantive unblock Feb 2 #14

Ok, let's go a little further her, if you would bluestarone Feb 2 #15

Large gifts would certainly be a worthy topic for congressional inquiry and subpoenas unblock Feb 2 #16

TYVM! bluestarone Feb 2 #17

Technically, yes. Torchlight Feb 2 #5

Agree. bluestarone Feb 2 #7

The short answer is yes... Ol Janx Spirit Feb 2 #8

History justaprogressive Feb 2 #10

How about we just impeach and remove. c-rational Feb 2 #18

Oh, how i wish. bluestarone Feb 2 #19