Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PSPS

(15,325 posts)
3. You're being a tad simplistic
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 08:07 PM
Dec 2012

There's nothing unusual or "wrong" about the Social Security Trust Fund bring invested in bonds. That's how it is designed and what it was mandated to do when it was set up under FDR. These bonds pay interest (which is added to the fund) and are, as you say, "special" in that they garner a higher return and even better security than ordinary Treasury bonds which, themselves, remain the safest place to put money in the world.

The whole notion of a "lockbox" never made sense to me because SS was never intended to be some kind of "mattress" into which contributions were to be stashed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Social Security and the Debt [View all] 1-Old-Man Dec 2012 OP
You can't just make stuff up and expect people to believe it. ( n/t ) Make7 Dec 2012 #1
............ Angry Dragon Dec 2012 #2
You're being a tad simplistic PSPS Dec 2012 #3
Try numbers. Igel Dec 2012 #4
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Social Security and the D...»Reply #3