Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

love_katz

(3,221 posts)
72. Insisting on political purity is what defeats Democratic candidates .
Thu Feb 5, 2026, 03:33 PM
3 hrs ago

Remember? "Genocide Joe? Killer Kamala"?

Electing Republicans does Not move our causes forward, it does the opposite.
Unfortunately, we have a binary political system. Whichever party wins the most votes, wins the election. Ergo, voting for a Third Party candidate, or getting mad and choosing to not vote because your favorite candidate didn't win the Primary, allows the wrong-wing Repuke Party to win.
A further problem is that some parts of the country are more prone to conservative beliefs ( due to brainwashing from local churches and continuing bombardment of propaganda from Corporate owned McGreedia and hate radio).
We can't change the political agenda if we don't have the numbers needed to do that. This problem is what is blocking us now.
To be successful in making any headway in stopping Project 2025, let alone the Puke's totalitarian plans for the future, we need to focus on turning purple areas blue, and red areas purple. And, obviously, keep blue areas blue.
I would LOVE for us to vote every single Repuke out of office. Throw them ALL OUT! Do I think that will happen? No, tragically I don't think it will. The Repukes have a huge megaphone in the form of the lying McGreedia and the fundy fanatic churches. The so-called liberal media doesn't exist. All of the major media companies are owned by very wealthy people who love their tax cuts.
The one avenue we have to stopping the broligarch theocracy agenda is to take back Congress. Once we have enough Dems in office to actually be effective in passing legislation, then we can lean hard on them to get what we want.
Refusing to vote for Dems because you didn't get your perfect candidate is putting the cart in front of the horse. That doesn't work and gives us disasters like A$$ Crack Dingleberry and his very evil enablers.
In order for Dems to win nationwide, they may have to run candidates that are less than the optimal people that we would prefer. Mamdani did great in NYC, but would he have any chance in more conservative areas? Sadly, probably not.
We can vote with our hearts in the Primary, but we need to Vote Blue in the general. Kick the sycophant Pukes out of office and then lean hard on our reps for the needed changes. This is a cart with the horse in front.
For the record: I'm an old hippie liberal who grew up during the 1960's. I have wanted massive changes, throughout my entire life. Trust this: refusing to eat any pie because you didn't get the whole pie doesn't work. My generation did create significant social changes. The opposition has worked ever since those days to try and knock it all down. They played the long game, beginning with the Lewis Powell memo in 1968. Please don't let them win . VOTE BLUE!!

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well played. Permanut 5 hrs ago #1
Absolutely! FalloutShelter 5 hrs ago #14
What are we playing? Own the libs? Ilikepurple 47 min ago #111
abolish ICE is not gonna happen and it is a bad look. there are some things I would like to see happen msongs 5 hrs ago #2
OK, did Shumer and Jeffries meet that minimum? Escurumbele 4 hrs ago #50
Also stop the roving kidnap patrols sboatcar 3 hrs ago #71
Well done. sheshe2 5 hrs ago #3
They're hiding under the couch hoping GOP unpopularity will propel them to majority. Won't work. 617Blue 5 hrs ago #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Gore1FL 5 hrs ago #12
People keep forgetting we have a MINORITY STATUS in Congress Just_Vote_Dem 5 hrs ago #5
You're right. If we don't understand that, MineralMan 5 hrs ago #7
The solution is not to roll over hoping for a belly scratch.. NT Gore1FL 5 hrs ago #15
Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 5 hrs ago #6
Great Idea. Now...How do you do that in reality? MineralMan 5 hrs ago #8
Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 5 hrs ago #9
You already said that. It's a great idea. MineralMan 5 hrs ago #11
Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 5 hrs ago #13
So you got nothing. beaglelover 5 hrs ago #20
Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 5 hrs ago #22
In two words. MineralMan 4 hrs ago #24
Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 4 hrs ago #26
I want a pony. tritsofme 3 hrs ago #64
Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 3 hrs ago #66
I want TWO ponies! tritsofme 2 hrs ago #84
Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 2 hrs ago #94
huh? Cirsium 21 min ago #117
Not really. Just "pull the plug" basically. FoxNewsSucks 4 hrs ago #41
My idea? JustAnotherGen 4 hrs ago #29
Use the Senate rules to stop ICE funding. Gore1FL 5 hrs ago #19
Both of my Senators would vote that way. MineralMan 4 hrs ago #23
No help from my Senators, unfortunately calguy 2 hrs ago #90
So using your voice to influence legislators is okay or not? Ilikepurple 1 hr ago #103
+1 GOP poll numbers make them vulnerable leftstreet 4 hrs ago #25
I'm going beyond that JustAnotherGen 4 hrs ago #30
That's the bottom line Prairie Gates 4 hrs ago #38
ICE has already been funded, it will continue to operate during a shutdown, and... W_HAMILTON 4 hrs ago #33
probably, but instead of rolling belly up, Dems should MAKE tRump do that. FoxNewsSucks 4 hrs ago #43
We do it when we have a trifect JustAnotherGen 3 hrs ago #56
So, They have money now and if we try to stop them from getting more... Gore1FL 1 hr ago #100
Vote against funding ICE for starters iemanja 3 hrs ago #63
It starts with advocay Cirsium 3 hrs ago #77
In reality, the next president can just issue intheflow 2 hrs ago #91
Missed the point, again, I see. Gore1FL 5 hrs ago #10
No, I did not. I missed nothing. MineralMan 5 hrs ago #18
So the intention is to gaslight? Gore1FL 1 hr ago #98
OK Cirsium 16 min ago #118
He did not miss the point. murielm99 3 hrs ago #79
I didn't know the point of DU was to cower in the corner. Gore1FL 1 hr ago #101
Well said! beaglelover 5 hrs ago #16
ICE hasn't been around that long, it was a fascist invention just like the debt ceiling, we can be the go along party or yaesu 5 hrs ago #17
What sort of fighting are you talking about? MineralMan 5 hrs ago #21
I would argue that there are "turning points" in between elections Ilikepurple 32 min ago #115
This point would have been arguable decades ago FHRRK 4 hrs ago #27
+1 leftstreet 3 hrs ago #78
It's very frustrating. Quiet Em 4 hrs ago #28
Dividing the Democratic Party is key. Targeting customized anti-Democratic attacks to fit. betsuni 4 hrs ago #36
Nonsense Cirsium 4 hrs ago #31
"People can disagree with leadership and still be loyal Democrats." W_HAMILTON 4 hrs ago #34
I strongly question that Cirsium 4 hrs ago #40
As a progressive myself, i am cleaning up my own house here. W_HAMILTON 4 hrs ago #44
Out of line Cirsium 3 hrs ago #76
Why do you question that? MineralMan 4 hrs ago #46
Of course Cirsium 3 hrs ago #80
"No single raindrop thinks it's responsible for the flood." W_HAMILTON 1 hr ago #104
Democrat Party? MineralMan 1 hr ago #97
Hardly Cirsium 56 min ago #107
Agree--I'm so tired of being accused of not being a loyal Democrat if I disagree with leadership on occasion crimycarny 3 hrs ago #54
Not having majorities in the House and Senate 3825-87867 2 hrs ago #93
FYI SocialDemocrat61 46 min ago #112
Come on angrychair 4 hrs ago #32
My answer has to do with only one thing - Elections. MineralMan 4 hrs ago #35
Yes we need to vote D. We also need to inspire nonvoters to do so. we can do it 4 hrs ago #39
No one person will meet 100% of any persons requirements. 1WorldHope 3 hrs ago #52
"Plump bump" Seinan Sensei 3 hrs ago #59
The full title is plump bump on my rump😎 1WorldHope 3 hrs ago #68
Abolish ICE we can do it 4 hrs ago #37
Yeah, that Got Us So Far in 2016 and 2024 Cha 4 hrs ago #42
These 2 are not meeting the moment, end of story dsp3000 4 hrs ago #45
I see. And I should be listening to you because... MineralMan 4 hrs ago #47
The Author Didn't Say You Should. It's A Declarative, Not An Imperative. ColoringFool 56 min ago #106
Not even 95%! hay rick 4 hrs ago #48
Just so. MineralMan 4 hrs ago #49
Exactly. betsuni 3 hrs ago #67
This message was self-deleted by its author hadEnuf 3 hrs ago #51
The only way to avoid disappointment is to lack principles. Renew Deal 3 hrs ago #53
Politicians doing politics, governing. No! True saviors MAKE evil disappear with magic FIGHTING to MEET THE MOMENT. betsuni 3 hrs ago #55
What I want to see. . . . BigDemVoter 3 hrs ago #57
The Trick Is to Get That Majority in Congress. MineralMan 3 hrs ago #69
THANK YOU! MorbidButterflyTat 3 hrs ago #58
Most of us care about standing up to fascism iemanja 3 hrs ago #60
Um. If 24 Republicans voted against a bill that only 7 Democrats voted for, there is no way it passed. Wiz Imp 3 hrs ago #73
You're right iemanja 1 hr ago #99
Yeah. Don't vote. That'll show them. CountMyVote4Reality 3 hrs ago #61
Vote in the Democratic primaries and vote for Progressive Democratic candidates! Clouds Passing 3 hrs ago #62
Please point to ANYONE saying they won't vote aocommunalpunch 3 hrs ago #65
Anyone saying they won't vote is not here on DU. MineralMan 3 hrs ago #70
Insisting on political purity is what defeats Democratic candidates . love_katz 3 hrs ago #72
This message was self-deleted by its author orangecrush 3 hrs ago #74
Recommended. H2O Man 3 hrs ago #75
Agree completely. cksmithy 3 hrs ago #81
Elections have consequences. love_katz 2 hrs ago #82
. Zelda_Orchid 2 hrs ago #83
I don't berate some for being upset, especially the current situation with ICE. mdbl 2 hrs ago #85
We're the minority party. Where's the advantage? QueerDuck 1 hr ago #95
Did you miss the part where the Senate can't pass the ICE portion without Democrats? mdbl 46 min ago #113
Everyone has reasons for supporting or not supporting the politicians that are elected to represent them. Nanjeanne 2 hrs ago #86
here's my deal quakerboy 2 hrs ago #87
It's more about people being tired of those who think performative resistance Rob H. 2 hrs ago #88
I am reminded of a line in Amiri Baraka's poem... NNadir 2 hrs ago #89
Yes! You speak for me! They should just IGNORE that we're the MINORITY party... QueerDuck 2 hrs ago #92
I think that may be the biggest straw man I've seen all week. Iggo 1 hr ago #96
I agree. BannonsLiver 1 hr ago #102
How Is Agreeing To Masks Making "No Masks" "Possible To.... ColoringFool 58 min ago #105
Bruce Springsteen - STREETS OF MINNEAPOLIS Emile 56 min ago #108
Reality is sometimes hard to accept Progressive dog 54 min ago #109
I Would Like A Positive Example Of When Compromise With Republicans Has Helped Achieve... ColoringFool 52 min ago #110
A straw man. Nice. themaguffin 39 min ago #114
As others have correctly pointed out, this is a straw man fallacy. De-rec. nt Celerity 30 min ago #116
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm So Disappointed with ...»Reply #72