General Discussion

Gore1FL

(22,885 posts)

100. So, They have money now and if we try to stop them from getting more...

Reply to W_HAMILTON (Reply #33)

Thu Feb 5, 2026, 05:30 PM

2 hrs ago

The GOP will do and say mean things.

Quite an argument not to fight for our values.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Scrivener7

148 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm So Disappointed with Schumer and Jeffries. They Don't Agree with Me 100%. [View all] MineralMan 6 hrs ago OP

Well played. Permanut 6 hrs ago #1

Absolutely! FalloutShelter 6 hrs ago #14

What are we playing? Own the libs? Ilikepurple 1 hr ago #111

Please define critical discussion mcar 33 min ago #123

abolish ICE is not gonna happen and it is a bad look. there are some things I would like to see happen msongs 6 hrs ago #2

OK, did Shumer and Jeffries meet that minimum? Escurumbele 5 hrs ago #50

Seems to me they have mcar 31 min ago #124

Also stop the roving kidnap patrols sboatcar 4 hrs ago #71

Well done. sheshe2 6 hrs ago #3

They're hiding under the couch hoping GOP unpopularity will propel them to majority. Won't work. 617Blue 6 hrs ago #4

This message was self-deleted by its author Gore1FL 6 hrs ago #12

People keep forgetting we have a MINORITY STATUS in Congress Just_Vote_Dem 6 hrs ago #5

You're right. If we don't understand that, MineralMan 6 hrs ago #7

The solution is not to roll over hoping for a belly scratch.. NT Gore1FL 6 hrs ago #15

Sorry that doesn't hold water LearnedHand 16 min ago #136

Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 6 hrs ago #6

Great Idea. Now...How do you do that in reality? MineralMan 6 hrs ago #8

Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 6 hrs ago #9

You already said that. It's a great idea. MineralMan 6 hrs ago #11

Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 6 hrs ago #13

So you got nothing. beaglelover 6 hrs ago #20

Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 6 hrs ago #22

In two words. MineralMan 6 hrs ago #24

Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 6 hrs ago #26

I want a pony. tritsofme 4 hrs ago #64

Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 4 hrs ago #66

I want TWO ponies! tritsofme 4 hrs ago #84

Abolish ICE Prairie Gates 3 hrs ago #94

huh? Cirsium 1 hr ago #117

Imagine thinking antifascism is wanting a pony! Prairie Gates 10 min ago #139

When I started hearing that "pony" nonsense Cirsium 6 min ago #142

The same supposed realists now asking how many mask wearing fascists should be allowed Prairie Gates 4 min ago #145

Not really. Just "pull the plug" basically. FoxNewsSucks 5 hrs ago #41

Well, then they can scream that Schumer/Jeffries "caved" mcar 30 min ago #126

My idea? JustAnotherGen 6 hrs ago #29

Use the Senate rules to stop ICE funding. Gore1FL 6 hrs ago #19

Both of my Senators would vote that way. MineralMan 6 hrs ago #23

No help from my Senators, unfortunately calguy 3 hrs ago #90

So using your voice to influence legislators is okay or not? Ilikepurple 2 hrs ago #103

+1 GOP poll numbers make them vulnerable leftstreet 6 hrs ago #25

I'm going beyond that JustAnotherGen 5 hrs ago #30

That's the bottom line Prairie Gates 5 hrs ago #38

ICE has already been funded, it will continue to operate during a shutdown, and... W_HAMILTON 5 hrs ago #33

probably, but instead of rolling belly up, Dems should MAKE tRump do that. FoxNewsSucks 5 hrs ago #43

Who is "rolling belly up?" nt mcar 28 min ago #128

We do it when we have a trifect JustAnotherGen 4 hrs ago #56

So, They have money now and if we try to stop them from getting more... Gore1FL 2 hrs ago #100

Vote against funding ICE for starters iemanja 4 hrs ago #63

It starts with advocay Cirsium 4 hrs ago #77

In reality, the next president can just issue intheflow 3 hrs ago #91

Missed the point, again, I see. Gore1FL 6 hrs ago #10

No, I did not. I missed nothing. MineralMan 6 hrs ago #18

So the intention is to gaslight? Gore1FL 2 hrs ago #98

OK Cirsium 1 hr ago #118

Is constantly bashing Schumer/Jeffries, mcar 27 min ago #129

"Bashing" vs accountability Cirsium 21 min ago #132

He did not miss the point. murielm99 4 hrs ago #79

I didn't know the point of DU was to cower in the corner. Gore1FL 2 hrs ago #101

I'm a purist when it comes to fascist gangs kidnapping and murdering people in the street Prairie Gates 8 min ago #141

Well said! beaglelover 6 hrs ago #16

ICE hasn't been around that long, it was a fascist invention just like the debt ceiling, we can be the go along party or yaesu 6 hrs ago #17

What sort of fighting are you talking about? MineralMan 6 hrs ago #21

I would argue that there are "turning points" in between elections Ilikepurple 1 hr ago #115

This point would have been arguable decades ago FHRRK 6 hrs ago #27

+1 leftstreet 4 hrs ago #78

It's very frustrating. Quiet Em 6 hrs ago #28

Dividing the Democratic Party is key. Targeting customized anti-Democratic attacks to fit. betsuni 5 hrs ago #36

Bingo! mcar 26 min ago #130

Nonsense Cirsium 5 hrs ago #31

"People can disagree with leadership and still be loyal Democrats." W_HAMILTON 5 hrs ago #34

I strongly question that Cirsium 5 hrs ago #40

As a progressive myself, i am cleaning up my own house here. W_HAMILTON 5 hrs ago #44

Out of line Cirsium 4 hrs ago #76

I'm not sure what cleaning house means other than resolving to silence progressive voices Ilikepurple 1 hr ago #119

And again, everyone here did vote for those people. Scrivener7 15 sec ago #148

Why do you question that? MineralMan 5 hrs ago #46

Of course Cirsium 4 hrs ago #80

"No single raindrop thinks it's responsible for the flood." W_HAMILTON 2 hrs ago #104

Democrat Party? MineralMan 2 hrs ago #97

Hardly Cirsium 2 hrs ago #107

Agree--I'm so tired of being accused of not being a loyal Democrat if I disagree with leadership on occasion crimycarny 4 hrs ago #54

Not having majorities in the House and Senate 3825-87867 3 hrs ago #93

FYI SocialDemocrat61 1 hr ago #112

You're telling Mineral Man to stop with the purity tests? mcar 25 min ago #131

Correct Cirsium 20 min ago #133

And those bashing Schumer/Jeffries aren't? mcar 18 min ago #134

I agree with that Cirsium 8 min ago #140

A. You invoked purity mcar 4 min ago #144

Come on angrychair 5 hrs ago #32

My answer has to do with only one thing - Elections. MineralMan 5 hrs ago #35

Yes we need to vote D. We also need to inspire nonvoters to do so. we can do it 5 hrs ago #39

No one person will meet 100% of any persons requirements. 1WorldHope 5 hrs ago #52

"Plump bump" Seinan Sensei 4 hrs ago #59

The full title is plump bump on my rump😎 1WorldHope 4 hrs ago #68

Abolish ICE we can do it 5 hrs ago #37

Yeah, that Got Us So Far in 2016 and 2024 Cha 5 hrs ago #42

These 2 are not meeting the moment, end of story dsp3000 5 hrs ago #45

I see. And I should be listening to you because... MineralMan 5 hrs ago #47

The Author Didn't Say You Should. It's A Declarative, Not An Imperative. ColoringFool 2 hrs ago #106

You made a post. The poster replied. How is their action more deserving of a snide dismissal than yours is? Scrivener7 17 min ago #135

Not even 95%! hay rick 5 hrs ago #48

Just so. MineralMan 5 hrs ago #49

Exactly. betsuni 4 hrs ago #67

This message was self-deleted by its author hadEnuf 5 hrs ago #51

The only way to avoid disappointment is to lack principles. Renew Deal 5 hrs ago #53

Politicians doing politics, governing. No! True saviors MAKE evil disappear with magic FIGHTING to MEET THE MOMENT. betsuni 4 hrs ago #55

What I want to see. . . . BigDemVoter 4 hrs ago #57

The Trick Is to Get That Majority in Congress. MineralMan 4 hrs ago #69

THANK YOU! MorbidButterflyTat 4 hrs ago #58

Most of us care about standing up to fascism iemanja 4 hrs ago #60

Um. If 24 Republicans voted against a bill that only 7 Democrats voted for, there is no way it passed. Wiz Imp 4 hrs ago #73

You're right iemanja 2 hrs ago #99

Yeah. Don't vote. That'll show them. CountMyVote4Reality 4 hrs ago #61

Vote in the Democratic primaries and vote for Progressive Democratic candidates! Clouds Passing 4 hrs ago #62

Please point to ANYONE saying they won't vote aocommunalpunch 4 hrs ago #65

Anyone saying they won't vote is not here on DU. MineralMan 4 hrs ago #70

Insisting on political purity is what defeats Democratic candidates . love_katz 4 hrs ago #72

This message was self-deleted by its author orangecrush 4 hrs ago #74

Recommended. H2O Man 4 hrs ago #75

Agree completely. cksmithy 4 hrs ago #81

Elections have consequences. love_katz 4 hrs ago #82

. Zelda_Orchid 4 hrs ago #83

I don't berate some for being upset, especially the current situation with ICE. mdbl 4 hrs ago #85

We're the minority party. Where's the advantage? QueerDuck 2 hrs ago #95

Did you miss the part where the Senate can't pass the ICE portion without Democrats? mdbl 1 hr ago #113

Everyone has reasons for supporting or not supporting the politicians that are elected to represent them. Nanjeanne 4 hrs ago #86

This is an awesome post. Scrivener7 13 min ago #137

here's my deal quakerboy 4 hrs ago #87

It's more about people being tired of those who think performative resistance Rob H. 3 hrs ago #88

I am reminded of a line in Amiri Baraka's poem... NNadir 3 hrs ago #89

Yes! You speak for me! They should just IGNORE that we're the MINORITY party... QueerDuck 3 hrs ago #92

I think that may be the biggest straw man I've seen all week. Iggo 2 hrs ago #96

Well, ya know, shit's not going to stir itself. Someone's gotta do it. Scrivener7 11 min ago #138

I agree. BannonsLiver 2 hrs ago #102

How Is Agreeing To Masks Making "No Masks" "Possible To.... ColoringFool 2 hrs ago #105

Bruce Springsteen - STREETS OF MINNEAPOLIS Emile 2 hrs ago #108

Reality is sometimes hard to accept Progressive dog 2 hrs ago #109

I Would Like A Positive Example Of When Compromise With Republicans Has Helped Achieve... ColoringFool 2 hrs ago #110

A straw man. Nice. themaguffin 1 hr ago #114

As others have correctly pointed out, this is a straw man fallacy. De-rec. nt Celerity 1 hr ago #116

How so? It seems we'll reasoned and right on target. QueerDuck 36 min ago #121

Waiting for permission from the future Cirsium 40 min ago #120

Why aren't they impeaching Trump RIGHT NOW!!11 mcar 35 min ago #122

Apparently they are lazy and too old... QueerDuck 4 min ago #143

Spineless, Turd Wayers mcar 3 min ago #146

I don't agree with Schumer and Jeffries 100% of the time SocialDemocrat61 31 min ago #125

RESCIND bdamomma 29 min ago #127

🪄🧙‍♂️🔮🧚‍♀️ It's so easy. Just do it. QueerDuck 2 min ago #147