Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(11,804 posts)

2. Well - I think nobody expects it to be long term - if there is a risk of impacting those in uniform

Mon Dec 31, 2012, 10:28 AM

Dec 2012

some sort of deal will be arrived at.

Bryant

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What are the 'cuts to the military' when we go 'over the cliff'? [View all] SHRED Dec 2012 OP

Right now it looks to be furloughs for civilians at a minimum ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #1

Its 7% I believe but that's all I think I know AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #3

They're pretty big. The House passed a measure undoing a lot of them, Recursion Dec 2012 #4

As Howard Dean said flamingdem Dec 2012 #6

Defense.. sendero Dec 2012 #5

I just responded with a similar sentiment flamingdem Dec 2012 #7

Simpson-Bowles assumed bigger defense cuts even than the sequester Recursion Dec 2012 #9

They won't be nearly enough, nor.. 99Forever Dec 2012 #8

10% on discretionary defense spending muriel_volestrangler Dec 2012 #10