Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TBF

(36,178 posts)
50. It is immoral to have folks starving in the streets
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 10:50 AM
Yesterday

Last edited Fri Feb 20, 2026, 02:35 PM - Edit history (1)

while others inherit wealth beyond their wildest dreams.

Beyond that, the folks that currently have the billions (and even multi-millions), while so many others struggle daily, is that it is affecting our form of government.

Billionaires now own our press, so that nothing negative is ever said about our president (who has on occasion declared himself a king). The extreme gap in wealth leads to the extreme gap in power as most are just struggling to get by as the very wealthy dominate the political systems, the press, the universities, the churches, the corporations, etc.

Most people in this country at this point in time have little hope of bettering their conditions, as they are locked into poverty from birth. It is always more likely that the children of the extremely wealthy are going to have extreme advantage in their own lives because they have so many advantages - they are not hungry and their foods are nutritious, they are clothed and have (magnificent) dwellings to live in, they receive the best education, the opportunities for enrichment and growth; the list goes on and on.

The real question is why we are standing for this. There are so many more of us than there are of them.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We Need to Talk About Rich People [View all] Haggard Celine Thursday OP
I've had the same thought. Nobody needs millions or billions of dollars in cash or properties to live a good life... wcmagumba Thursday #1
I agree. Haggard Celine Thursday #2
And get rid of stepped up basis TexasBushwhacker Thursday #6
They have it figured out, don't they? Haggard Celine Thursday #10
And all that hoarding of capital TexasBushwhacker Thursday #11
I think they're trying to fix the economy so that it runs on Haggard Celine Thursday #15
But that's not sustainable TexasBushwhacker Yesterday #16
Texas, you have an answer for me regarding how much stepped up basis you're willing to exclude? PeaceWave Yesterday #18
I think that's what we should shoot for. Haggard Celine Yesterday #19
That's what I wonder about too. AZJonnie Yesterday #35
I often wonder how many of the common people do not understand this- no wonder the rich don't want Stargazer99 Yesterday #37
ALL stepped up basis? Throwing the baby out with the bath water, isn't it? PeaceWave Thursday #12
Of course, and I have no problem with a spouse TexasBushwhacker Thursday #13
Okay, so you've already made an exception for a spouse. What about for children? And, how much? PeaceWave Thursday #14
Not only that, markodochartaigh Yesterday #29
Definitely a rigged system TexasBushwhacker Yesterday #44
Let them earn (or steal) as much money as they want but Marie Marie Thursday #3
I think that's fair. Haggard Celine Thursday #5
Makes me sick! CountAllVotes Thursday #4
They think it all should be theirs. Haggard Celine Thursday #8
Line em up VanceFan Thursday #7
A health care system would be a nice start. Haggard Celine Thursday #9
Immigrants Aren't Stealing Your Jobs Mr.Bee Yesterday #17
He said he was going after criminals and Haggard Celine Yesterday #22
ICE is hiring the criminals. Thus the need for masks. travelingthrulife Yesterday #45
And it isn't capitalism Figarosmom Yesterday #20
OP, I notice that you didn't define either "wealthy" or "rich." How do we know who to go after? PeaceWave Yesterday #21
Just like everything else, the government would have to decide Haggard Celine Yesterday #23
Eventually though, these kinds of suggestions must narrow down to a specific number... PeaceWave Yesterday #24
Well, any number is going to be Haggard Celine Yesterday #27
Without actual numbers regarding the taxation of wealth, the discussion collapses into vaguery... PeaceWave Yesterday #28
I don't know all the laws about Haggard Celine Yesterday #31
Found this book at the thriftstore Puppyjive Yesterday #25
Reagan broke the guardrails that prevented this. I don't think live love laugh Yesterday #26
On limiting how much people can accumulate canetoad Yesterday #30
I just want to take a lot of the power Haggard Celine Yesterday #32
Elon Musk canetoad Yesterday #33
Well said! Haggard Celine Yesterday #34
The most doable thing with the best bang for buck is to invalidate Citizens United and force public funding of elections AZJonnie Yesterday #36
It all goes back to that. And that goes back to the complete corruption of the Supreme Court under Roberts. Scrivener7 Yesterday #39
I was just thinking this morning that we didn't use to be so dependent on giant privately owned corporations. Scrivener7 Yesterday #38
Well said. Haggard Celine Yesterday #41
You want them taken down a notch? OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #40
Yes! AND stop giving them your money! I don't get why people won't do this. Scrivener7 Yesterday #42
Programming, my friend... programming. OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #43
Yeesh. I hate that you're so right. Scrivener7 16 hrs ago #51
Message auto-removed Name removed Yesterday #46
bye bye KS Toronado Yesterday #47
And? BannonsLiver Yesterday #48
Well, perhaps we can narrow the scope to wealth inequality TBF Yesterday #49
It is immoral to have folks starving in the streets TBF Yesterday #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We Need to Talk About Ric...»Reply #50