General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(9,814 posts)

42. 🙄

Reply to angrychair (Reply #38)

Sat Mar 7, 2026, 06:55 PM

Mar 7

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

118 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm done with this [View all] angrychair Mar 7 OP

Make their voting records public and easy to find for anyone. They need shamed Deuxcents Mar 7 #1

Vote D over R... lame54 Mar 7 #2

No more trillion dollar military budgets angrychair Mar 7 #5

No.more R's lame54 Mar 7 #7

No more warmongers. angrychair Mar 7 #8

The warmonger in chief... lame54 Mar 7 #9

I didn't vote for him angrychair Mar 7 #10

I understand your polnt and mostly agree. wnylib Mar 7 #46

Not true Cirsium Mar 7 #17

Disagree... lame54 Mar 7 #62

What has happened? Cirsium Mar 7 #70

Republicans thank you for your service. W_HAMILTON Mar 7 #12

Both Sides Warmongers message aimed at potential Democratic voters in 2028 to discourage participating. betsuni Sunday #84

Yep. This is YET another post that is trying to suppress the vote and discourage people from voting for Democrats. QueerDuck Sunday #90

Unless it's Fetterman. 56miSSie Mar 7 #74

Post removed Post removed Mar 7 #3

Staying for pizza? Totally Tunsie Mar 7 #4

Irony is not their strong suit, is it? n/t ok_cpu Mar 7 #6

agree. Maru Kitteh Mar 7 #11

The circular firing squad forms RetiredParatrooper Mar 7 #13

Not binary thinking angrychair Mar 7 #15

don't vote for Kamala because she supported "Genocide Joe" lapfog_1 Mar 7 #31

It very much is RetiredParatrooper Mar 7 #60

No angrychair Mar 7 #66

I don't care for either endless war, or endless budgets RetiredParatrooper Sunday #82

Well good luck with that. Happy Hoosier Sunday #102

Nope angrychair Sunday #118

binary thinking? rampartd Mar 7 #61

we Skittles Mar 7 #77

It's amazing Orrex Sunday #83

What it boils down to is that we must not suggest we can do better. All those of us who do that Scrivener7 Sunday #101

If the choice is between a Dem that supports military funding ... Zelda_Orchid Mar 7 #14

Then this cycle will continue angrychair Mar 7 #19

And the fascists will use their propaganda machine to make you believe that. Zelda_Orchid Mar 7 #22

If you are Democrat angrychair Mar 7 #23

If you're a Democrat, you support getting rid of the fascists. Zelda_Orchid Mar 7 #33

What is arbitrary angrychair Mar 7 #37

The Democratic Party is a coalition. With different factions uniting for the common good. Zelda_Orchid Mar 7 #41

I'm confused angrychair Mar 7 #52

Post removed Post removed Mar 7 #54

Ok angrychair Mar 7 #57

It's much easier to have a real conversation about military funding with someone who isn't trying to kill you. Zelda_Orchid Mar 7 #58

One would argue angrychair Mar 7 #64

Have fun living in a dictatorship Wiz Imp Mar 7 #36

Why? angrychair Mar 7 #38

🙄 Wiz Imp Mar 7 #42

All due respect angrychair Mar 7 #44

🙂 Wiz Imp Mar 7 #75

and so you are STILL saying - that you fully intend to 'sit out' (withhold your vote/support) stopdiggin Mar 7 #79

No, that's not what I said angrychair Sunday #85

I share your frustration with the size of the military-industrial complex. However... QueerDuck Sunday #91

Then how can we expect anything to change? angrychair Mar 7 #67

yeah, we need to force change, but it's not simple or easy and we can't afford to not vote for the Democrat themaguffin Sunday #92

Unless something has changed very recently Quiet Em Mar 7 #16

Phew! That's one Dem bullet dodged! MorbidButterflyTat Mar 7 #55

Thank you! Summarizing it quite nicely. stopdiggin Mar 7 #80

Funny how they always seem to have juuuust enough votes orangecrush Mar 7 #18

Funny how Putin popsdenver Sunday #81

Careful you'll upset the obnoxiously self righteous people SunImp Mar 7 #20

Exactly angrychair Mar 7 #21

Then you won't be voting this year? paleotn Mar 7 #29

I will happily angrychair Mar 7 #34

It seems you're moving the goal posts. paleotn Mar 7 #47

My point is this angrychair Mar 7 #59

Got it. I agree. paleotn Mar 7 #71

Well the USS Ford angrychair Mar 7 #73

And rightfully so. paleotn Mar 7 #28

Talking down to people is never a winning strategy SunImp Mar 7 #35

"Talking down to people" is exactly what #OP is doing, innit? Zelda_Orchid Mar 7 #45

.. SunImp Mar 7 #53

Sometimes you simply can't help yourself. paleotn Mar 7 #48

I'm impressed by the confidence it takes to lecture others on 'talking down' to people while using those adjectives. QueerDuck Sunday #88

The obnoxiously self-righteous people who are correct about purity tests Fullduplexxx Sunday #104

Here we go again. Same old arguments just before an election. Some folks never learn. sop Mar 7 #24

Not the same angrychair Mar 7 #26

Thing is, I agree with your position of not supporting war funding, endless wars and trillion dollar military budgets. sop Mar 7 #39

How so? angrychair Mar 7 #43

If elections were only about stopping endless war funding and trillion dollar military budgets, I would agree with you, sop Mar 7 #50

Those are all that matter angrychair Mar 7 #56

Not voting for (and sabotaging) Democrats doesn't prevent the funding. Instead, it just guarantees MORE funding... QueerDuck Sunday #89

Yes it the same ...she has a funny laugh, but her emails . Gitmo was closed fast enough Fullduplexxx Sunday #95

Recommended. H2O Man Mar 7 #25

I hear you angrychair Mar 7 #30

Baby meet bathwater. paleotn Mar 7 #27

Why? angrychair Mar 7 #40

See 47 above. Your argument may not have been clear. At least to me. paleotn Mar 7 #49

Admittedly angrychair Mar 7 #68

I know it's fucking disgusting every fucking election we get these people Fullduplexxx Sunday #106

DURec leftstreet Mar 7 #32

I agree LetMyPeopleVote Mar 7 #51

so do I Celerity Sunday #113

Everyone should keep an eye on their own Senators. Quiet Em Mar 7 #63

Wow. The people in this thread who are arguing with you are actually insisting that we mustn't have Scrivener7 Mar 7 #65

We are faced with 2 candidates NH Ethylene Mar 7 #69

One, I would never vote for a Republican angrychair Mar 7 #72

If the Democratic candidate also voted for military funding, you would vote for a third party candidate instead? MichMan Mar 7 #76

Did angrychair ever say anything remotely resembling that? If so, please link to it. Scrivener7 Sunday #97

I don't see any other way to interpret their own words MichMan Sunday #111

"another penny of military funding .." (that would include paying service members ..?) stopdiggin Mar 7 #78

I am kinda confused here with your post. sheshe2 Sunday #86

Evidently Democrats chomping at the bit for "endless wars and bottomless military budgets" and betsuni Sunday #87

Yup, first I heard of it. sheshe2 Sunday #110

"Defund the Military" makes as much political sense as "Defund the Police"... QueerDuck Sunday #107

You are right. sheshe2 Sunday #109

I understand your frustration - and luckily its the primary season TBF Sunday #93

Just like those who wouldnt vote for her because of her emails Fullduplexxx Sunday #94

Really? Do you think it's just like that? Scrivener7 Sunday #96

Yes it is. Fullduplexxx Sunday #98

We'll have to agree to each think the other is bat shit crazy. Scrivener7 Sunday #99

Well then enjoy the rest of trump's 2nd term and his 3rd term. Fullduplexxx Sunday #103

Which is a deliberate misinterpretation. Read angrychairs other posts in this thread. Scrivener7 Sunday #105

Just going by their words as written. If that's not what they intended, they should edit it. MichMan Sunday #114

This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Sunday #115

Angrychair, I appreciate your post, and I'm sorry to see the finger-waggers have arrived to distort its message. Scrivener7 Sunday #100

Finger wagers? SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #108

It's sad, really. MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #117

DONE. WITH. WAR. Clouds Passing Sunday #112

Let's get real MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #116