Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

EarlG

(23,766 posts)
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 09:38 AM Mar 2026

A reminder to all DUers reposting content from social media: Check your sources [View all]

Given the situation in the Middle East, it's understandable that people want to bring the most up-to-date information they can find to DU. In principle, I'm absolutely not opposed to that. In practice, however, it means that some of the content now being brought to DU is being reposted from sources which are not appropriate for our community.

I am talking about social media sources which traffic in right-wing content, racist content, homophobic content, antisemitic content, and conspiracy content, including anti-vax conspiracy theories. Or, more often than not, all of the above.

I will note that DU's "Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources" rule does carve out an exception for such sources:

Do not post right-wing talking points or smears. Do not post content sourced from right-wing publications, authors, or pundits. Exceptions are permitted if you provide a clear reason for doing so that is consistent with the values of this website.

Note that if you want to use a source which would typically be considered inappropriate for DU, you need to to give a clear reason for why you're doing it. If the purpose is to point out that MAGA media is turning against Trump, or if you want to highlight the awfulness of a particular X post by some right-wing public figure, then you need to give a clear explanation that that is your intent.

But simply reposting content from neo-Nazi or other extremist social media accounts, just because they've criticized Trump or other Republicans, or because they've posted an update about the war with Iran, does NOT count under the rule exception.

As you know, DU relies on the community to police itself via the Jury system. Of course, not all members serving on Juries are aware of whether certain X accounts are inappropriate, and people are often not likely to bother to check. This can make it easy for inappropriate sources to slip through. If Jury members see a post bashing Trump or Republicans, they are probably likely to think it's okay, and will be unlikely to click through to the X account only to find that it is selling white supremacist T-shirts.

So:

1) To DU members who are reposting content from social media: Please check your sources before posting to make sure that the source is appropriate for DU.

2) To DU members who are serving on Juries for the "Don't peddle right-wing talking points, smears, or sources" rule: Please don't just assume that a social media source is okay if it is bashing Trump -- actually check the source to make sure that it is appropriate for DU. If you do not wish to click through to a social media site to check the source, it is perfectly okay to cancel out of the Jury and let someone else take a look.

Thanks for reading, and for being part of the effort to keep DU clear of bigoted sources and content.
77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks for the clarification, EarlG UpInArms Mar 2026 #1
Also, just stop posting content from the Nazi bar on DU. demmiblue Mar 2026 #2
Yup, I would love no inks to Twitter at all obamanut2012 Mar 2026 #10
I won't click on any links to X. CaptainTruth Mar 2026 #12
I put people who constantly post X content on ignore. demmiblue Mar 2026 #15
I do that too. hunter Mar 2026 #58
Same here. niyad Mar 2026 #20
It's still the largest hub for news and commentary leftstreet Mar 2026 #18
I don't think that is true anymore, sans the extreme right-wing content. demmiblue Mar 2026 #26
That's great there's another source n/t leftstreet Mar 2026 #28
It's also the best source for breaking financial and overseas news jmbar2 Mar 2026 #37
It is. Blue Sky is mostly a US thing. LeftInTX Mar 2026 #65
Everyone??? ShazzieB Mar 2026 #61
I go for breaking news. When we bombed Iran, I was on Flight Radar until Iran jammed the radars. LeftInTX Mar 2026 #66
Thanks Earl Nittersing Mar 2026 #3
I wish the Democracy Now! posts could be murielm99 Mar 2026 #4
That is a bit unfair jfz9580m Mar 2026 #34
disagree Kali Mar 2026 #55
I can not believe attacking democracy now is allowed here questionseverything Mar 2026 #57
Democracy Now attacks Democrats! LeftInTX Mar 2026 #67
It's a news show, letting people hear from lesser candidates on the ballot is what the news should do questionseverything Mar 2026 #68
They do. And they constantly bash Democrats. LeftInTX Mar 2026 #70
Democracy Now is kind of like how the evening news used to be AZProgressive Mar 2026 #74
Not during the 2024 election. All they did was bash the Democrats. LeftInTX Mar 2026 #76
Thanks, EarlG. greatauntoftriplets Mar 2026 #5
K&R PatSeg Mar 2026 #6
Thanks EarlG MustLoveBeagles Mar 2026 #7
there has to be a "but" GusBob Mar 2026 #8
Do you have specific examples in mind? niyad Mar 2026 #11
because of course it NEVER happens ... stopdiggin Mar 2026 #23
So asking for specific examples is denying the truth of the poster's niyad Mar 2026 #24
No. but it IS often a tactic used to nullify, diminish or dismiss ... stopdiggin Mar 2026 #31
I see. So showing where **I** have made such posts would be something niyad Mar 2026 #39
"having accused me of such .. " stopdiggin Mar 2026 #71
If it both takes you that long to find one example and is not worth your time to do so... W_HAMILTON Mar 2026 #44
and 'rampant' was never mentioned, or really even implied, in either the post I replied to stopdiggin Mar 2026 #72
So asking for specific examples is denying the truth of the poster's niyad Mar 2026 #25
Yes I do GusBob Mar 2026 #40
Not a problem. I simply wondered what I might have missed in the niyad Mar 2026 #43
Don't fret wolfie001 Mar 2026 #62
Thank you, EarlG. Sadly, the list of trusted, reliable, ethical sources niyad Mar 2026 #9
Roger that orangecrush Mar 2026 #13
I never click on an X posting... MiHale Mar 2026 #14
Actually, on each X post, you can click on Grok symbol to check womanofthehills Mar 2026 #47
Is there a list of inimical sites for us naive jurors? dickthegrouch Mar 2026 #16
I think he was talking about right wing sources ON some social media sites Kali Mar 2026 #56
Problem is Independent journalists womanofthehills Mar 2026 #73
yeah that is the beauty/"problem" with the jury system Kali Mar 2026 #75
KnR Alice Kramden Mar 2026 #17
It is getting much harder to tell truth from lies. BlueKota Mar 2026 #19
"It is getting much harder to tell truth from lies." True Dough Mar 2026 #30
Agreed! BlueKota Mar 2026 #42
To be clear, and this is also addressed to one of the posts above, EarlG Mar 2026 #32
A little confusing. LiberalLovinLug Mar 2026 #60
The latter EarlG Mar 2026 #64
Got it thanks! LiberalLovinLug Mar 2026 #77
You can click on Grok symbol on every X post womanofthehills Mar 2026 #48
💯 💯 💯 💯 SSJVegeta Mar 2026 #21
K&R Gets more important every day to maintain integrity...nt Wounded Bear Mar 2026 #22
Thank you, EarlG!! nt PunkinPi Mar 2026 #27
Thank you... This is my favorite place to get the latest news stories from all over the net.. Peacetrain Mar 2026 #29
Thank you, EarlG. sueh Mar 2026 #33
Please use in an appropriate forum too Marthe48 Mar 2026 #35
I verify most posts these days. Lots of clickbait. lindysalsagal Mar 2026 #36
Thanks... 2naSalit Mar 2026 #38
Most DUers have no desire to provide extra clicks to the right-wing media FakeNoose Mar 2026 #41
Problem I've had in past womanofthehills Mar 2026 #49
Always be sure the source is identified in your post FakeNoose Mar 2026 #52
This sounds like Twitter/X in general: LudwigPastorius Mar 2026 #45
Great to see this. Some of the sites have really offensive content, not just political but dehumanizing. JudyM Mar 2026 #46
Here's a new tidbit. usonian Mar 2026 #50
When you say "that site", it would be useful to specify which of the 2 sites you mention you are talking about muriel_volestrangler Mar 2026 #54
K pwb Mar 2026 #51
I'll stick with 'social media reposts are sloppy and lazy' and ignore them unless Torchlight Mar 2026 #53
I see a lot of that from "the usual suspects" Skittles Mar 2026 #59
Thank You for the PSA, EarlG... Cha Mar 2026 #63
Thanks for the reminder, EarlG. B.See Mar 2026 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A reminder to all DUers r...