Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There are no ethical billionaires. I said it. [View all]MadameButterfly
(4,084 posts)90. George Soros has donated 32 billion and still has 7.2 billion
I think given numbers like that it's a little presumptuous of any of us to decide where the line is of how much money he can retain to qualify as a good person.
I can't speak about the dealings of rich businessmen, but we know how Paul McCartney made his money. I'd say the world is better for it. He is recognized as one of the top celebrity donors. One of his many causes is to end poverty.
That said, we need all kinds of laws to limit the abuse of money and power by wealthy people, and to shrink the income gap. I just don't feel the need to proclaim that all billionaires are bad. There are plenty that I know are bad, and I'll stick to that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree - plus as the Epstein files show us it gives them a sense of invulnerability
OhioBlue
Mar 12
#2
White men didn't have to compete against women or African-Americans for higher-paying jobs
Jose Garcia
Mar 13
#108
Neither have I. What was it $20 an hour we were all supposed to be getting
yellowdogintexas
Mar 12
#71
I was going to say the same. But I looked him up to make sure there wasn't some obvious
MadameButterfly
Mar 12
#29
Nothing is more pathetic, and dangerous than a person who is worth billions wanting more.
patphil
Mar 12
#12
I think there are some that are ethical, just not enough. And I agree that billionaires should not be allowed to exist,
Fil1957
Mar 12
#17
Hopefully the Democratic Party doesnt make that opinion a platform of the Party.
Callie1979
Mar 12
#23
Yes! Getting rid of unfair tax breaks, untaxed income, etc. Things MANY would get behind
Callie1979
Mar 12
#63
Weird though how billionaires poisoning politics will cause us to lose Democracy though
ck4829
Mar 13
#97
Thats just ONE. And while I think we need controls, I just dont see MONEY changing votes.
Callie1979
Mar 13
#115
I'm in a swing state. I saw tons of ads from both. Total spend wasnt much different.
Callie1979
Mar 16
#131
You don't think JB Pritzker and Tom Steyer are reliably on our side? Seriously?
ancianita
Mar 12
#42
I prefer Steyer stay out of the governor's race until he gets some experience.
MadameButterfly
Mar 12
#44
You need to take a closer look at him, imo. Just what is your standard for "enough" political experience?
ancianita
Mar 12
#47
Off the top, JB Pritzker is an ethical billionaire. You don't want him allowed to exist? What does that even mean?
ancianita
Mar 12
#40
Anti-billionaires here are too broad brush. The mentality of throwing out the baby with the bath water is
ancianita
Mar 12
#48
Anyone who alerts your post is an idiot. You stated an opinion not an insult.
Callie1979
Mar 13
#106
People collect cats and newspapers and get called hoarders. Do it with cash and you're a "genius"
ck4829
Mar 13
#95
A very wealthy man once told my co-worker that "the problem with you, is that you don't know how to FUCK people." nt
Evolve Dammit
Mar 12
#50
"is value extracted from others, and frequently in ways that are less than ethical."
EX500rider
Mar 18
#139