Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: They Didn't Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth. [View all]Solly Mack
(96,947 posts)3. ...
Cattle.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
11 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They Didn't Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth. [View all]
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 14
OP
Wow. That is appalling. The child is more important than the woman, no matter what.
Biophilic
Mar 14
#2
What's extreme about this situation is forcing someone who's in active labor into a court hearing to establish legally
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 14
#5
People make medical decisions that result in their own deaths all the time.
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 14
#7
Exhibit A: all those Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse blood transfusions for themselves OR their children.
ShazzieB
Mar 14
#39
Exactly what part of viable, at term, and in fetal distress do you not fucking understand?
paleotn
Mar 14
#38
And? An obstetrics team is going to go to all that trouble unless it's for a good reason?
paleotn
Mar 14
#57
The woman stated she had already had a life threatening complication from a C Section.
Hope22
Mar 14
#61
Yes, I'm willing to sacrifice the lives of some full term fetuses to protect women's rights to bodily autonomy.
Crunchy Frog
Mar 15
#66
It was the woman's profession, but in her own case she was not making the safest decision
karynnj
Mar 14
#44
If ONLY the decision was based on the health and welfare of the mother... the existing
slightlv
Mar 14
#45
It's not as rare as people think, and it doesn't matter if someone thinks it's "safest".
Crunchy Frog
Mar 15
#65
It's not just Florida. In almost 30 states, hospitals can override the advance directives of pregnant people.
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 14
#14
Eh, men do give birth and it still is a thing, but likely because of the discrimination trans men face.
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 14
#13
Beyond appalling. Mother first, unless both can be saved & the mother's wishes unclear (& she is
hlthe2b
Mar 14
#16
If it's an emergency C-Sect, fetal distress, certain maternal conditions, unknown fetal conditions etc.
LeftInTX
Mar 14
#28
Glad I posted this thread. It's good to get a reminder about just how easily so many people are willing to sign away
WhiskeyGrinder
Mar 14
#41
This is absolutely disgusting. Under no circumstances should women ever be robbed of the right to
Crunchy Frog
Mar 15
#64