Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AllyCat

(18,856 posts)
52. 3 prior c-sections are a HUGE risk. But,
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 08:42 PM
Mar 14

This should have been addressed LONG before she went into labor.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

a 3 hr hearing when she is in ACTIVE LABOR??!!!! mopinko Mar 14 #1
Wow. That is appalling. The child is more important than the woman, no matter what. Biophilic Mar 14 #2
Extreme situation. But perhaps it was the safest option for woman and child. paleotn Mar 14 #4
What's extreme about this situation is forcing someone who's in active labor into a court hearing to establish legally WhiskeyGrinder Mar 14 #5
What about dying makes it unacceptable? paleotn Mar 14 #6
People make medical decisions that result in their own deaths all the time. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 14 #7
And that's perfectly fine with me. paleotn Mar 14 #37
You're reccing your own posts? Crunchy Frog Mar 15 #67
So what. I didn't rec if 4 TIMES paleotn Mar 15 #76
Exhibit A: all those Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse blood transfusions for themselves OR their children. ShazzieB Mar 14 #39
The pregnant woman's profession was assisting women to deliver safely....got it? Hope22 Mar 14 #9
Exactly what part of viable, at term, and in fetal distress do you not fucking understand? paleotn Mar 14 #38
Your last sentence... GenThePerservering Mar 14 #42
Tell that to the person who I responded to, not me. paleotn Mar 14 #43
The hearing was three hours long. Quiet Em Mar 14 #46
She was in labor for 12 freaking hours!!!!!! paleotn Mar 14 #47
and? Quiet Em Mar 14 #48
And? An obstetrics team is going to go to all that trouble unless it's for a good reason? paleotn Mar 14 #57
No, I'm not an OB-GYN and neither are you. Quiet Em Mar 14 #59
SO WHAT!? paleotn Mar 15 #75
You seem to believe you know a lot Quiet Em Mar 15 #77
And you know that how? paleotn Mar 15 #78
What crap has your partner seen many, many times? Quiet Em Mar 15 #79
Fine. You don't want trained, profession opinion, go treat yourself. paleotn Mar 15 #80
Why are you so hostile? Quiet Em Mar 15 #81
Ah, you're being omniscient again. paleotn Mar 15 #82
My son was born after 30 hrs. of labor. Whats your point? Lochloosa Mar 14 #50
Medical professionals didn't go to this extreme unless there was good reason. paleotn Mar 14 #56
12 hours of labor is NOT. VERY. LONG. Crunchy Frog Mar 15 #68
Post removed Post removed Mar 15 #73
The woman stated she had already had a life threatening complication from a C Section. Hope22 Mar 14 #61
Yes, I'm willing to sacrifice the lives of some full term fetuses to protect women's rights to bodily autonomy. Crunchy Frog Mar 15 #66
It was the woman's profession, but in her own case she was not making the safest decision karynnj Mar 14 #44
3 prior c-sections Freddie Mar 14 #53
Completely agree karynnj Mar 14 #54
My first was a C-section buzzycrumbhunger Mar 14 #58
If ONLY the decision was based on the health and welfare of the mother... the existing slightlv Mar 14 #45
The patient in question is a doula. usedtobedemgurl Mar 14 #49
Because she's a doula doesn't mean she is a good doula. ToxMarz Mar 14 #51
Sure. Of course a judge knows better. Ok. usedtobedemgurl Mar 15 #62
No, I am not saying that ToxMarz Mar 15 #74
Ok usedtobedemgurl Mar 15 #83
I worked in that field. When you're in the hospital, you don't have a choice. LeftInTX Mar 14 #20
It's not as rare as people think, and it doesn't matter if someone thinks it's "safest". Crunchy Frog Mar 15 #65
only the fetus stage Kali Mar 14 #8
Yup, the kid is on his or her own. Biophilic Mar 14 #19
It seems to me... GiqueCee Mar 14 #34
... Solly Mack Mar 14 #3
Whose body is it? dlk Mar 14 #10
In states like Florida, the state has control over a woman's body erronis Mar 14 #11
It's not just Florida. In almost 30 states, hospitals can override the advance directives of pregnant people. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 14 #14
Darwin's body. paleotn Mar 14 #36
Jeezus. If men gave birth, this would not be a thing. Joinfortmill Mar 14 #12
Eh, men do give birth and it still is a thing, but likely because of the discrimination trans men face. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 14 #13
I've had four c-sections Mossfern Mar 14 #15
I'm so glad you and your babies survived these! erronis Mar 14 #17
Thank you for this thoughtful post. LisaM Mar 14 #21
I think the trauma Mossfern Mar 14 #24
I was a nurse in newborn. LeftInTX Mar 14 #23
I was surprised to learn episiotomies aren't recommended anymore Sympthsical Mar 14 #33
I had three kids: LeftInTX Mar 14 #35
Interesting. Thank you for sharing! Sympthsical Mar 14 #55
I have also had four c-sections. Bettie Mar 15 #72
Beyond appalling. Mother first, unless both can be saved & the mother's wishes unclear (& she is hlthe2b Mar 14 #16
I was going to share this. Thank you so much for doing it! ... littlemissmartypants Mar 14 #18
Hands off women's wombs. perverts! GreenWave Mar 14 #22
Women of reproductive age need to get the hell out of Florida. This is absurd. Quiet Em Mar 14 #25
I see no reason for a judge to be called into this. Ilsa Mar 14 #26
If it's an emergency C-Sect, fetal distress, certain maternal conditions, unknown fetal conditions etc. LeftInTX Mar 14 #28
Oh, I know, I've been there. I was relieved when Ilsa Mar 14 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author MorbidButterflyTat Mar 14 #31
That sounds terrifying MorbidButterflyTat Mar 14 #32
I lived in a county that for a time had the highest Ilsa Mar 14 #27
Wondering... MorbidButterflyTat Mar 14 #30
I read the ProPublica article cksmithy Mar 14 #40
Glad I posted this thread. It's good to get a reminder about just how easily so many people are willing to sign away WhiskeyGrinder Mar 14 #41
3 prior c-sections are a HUGE risk. But, AllyCat Mar 14 #52
This story really bothered me so I did some more research Quiet Em Mar 14 #60
This is like Rosemary's baby! C Moon Mar 15 #63
This is absolutely disgusting. Under no circumstances should women ever be robbed of the right to Crunchy Frog Mar 15 #64
Interesting to see how much anti-choice sentiment there really is here on DU. Article and the responses Crunchy Frog Mar 15 #69
Agree. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 15 #71
OMG 😳 this is insane. The hospital was so wrong in this. If it was me I would be so furious what they did TommieMommy Mar 15 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They Didn't Want to Have ...»Reply #52