Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,181 posts)
36. he was an effective legislative leader in the majority
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 10:27 AM
Sunday

...like every other Democrat in that role.

That's why Democrats ALWAYS produce progressive legislative change, and produce a strong growing economy as they focus on the people.

Schumer is essentially the same type of Senate leader that's fought republicans for decades and decades. He leads by the consensus of his membership, like every other leader before him did since the days of party bosses ended decades ago.

I don't have unrealistic opinions about the Dem leadership, because I'm clear-eyed about who put them in that role, and fully aware that pols who insist on bringing their personal agenda to the job aren't really able to reconcile differences between often disparate interests and concerns from diverse regions of the nation.

I think most people criticizing him don't understand the role of the Democratic leader and think he has some magic stick that he can just wave around and move the intractable republican majority to vote for Democratic initiatives.

It's sophistry, or it's just a misunderstanding of the dynamic of a minority party, or even a slim majority, and the role leaders play in organizing the membership to unite on legislation.

'Liking' Schumer isn't the point at all here. It's the collective consensus of the Dem membership that drives the process, not one individual; not in our successes or our failures. Schumer's term hasn't ben an exception to any of that.

And remember, EVERY legislative advancement Biden made went through his Senate during his term as leader. Look at his career timeline, especially in the period we're discussing, and acknowledge the work he's done and the progress he's overseen.

Look at the timeline. It's so much more than the caricature that critics present with one line posts telling him to quit.

Career Timeline of Chuck Schumer: Major Achievements and Milestones
https://populartimelines.com/timeline/Chuck-Schumer/career-achievements

What's not to like in all that?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't give a FUCK what repukes think Skittles Sunday #1
I get that bigtree Sunday #2
I THINK DEMS NEED NEW LEADERSHIP Skittles Sunday #3
I'M FED UP WITH PEOPLE TEARING OUR LEADERS DOWN bigtree Sunday #4
A LOT OF US CALL IT LIKE WE SEE IT Skittles Sunday #6
do what you want bigtree Sunday #8
Calling voters stupid and irresponsible is a great way to get them to to polls. Orrex Sunday #27
Some voters do self identify LOL SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #31
So what do you like about Schumer's leadership? dem4decades Sunday #30
he was an effective legislative leader in the majority bigtree Sunday #36
dems can deal with that after the election not slug it out in advance IMO msongs Sunday #5
What, specifically are you looking for? creeksneakers2 Sunday #12
Let's wait until the Republicans are out of power mzmolly Sunday #33
Me too Ferrets are Cool Sunday #39
Plus it all feeds into the corporate media's SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #7
There isn't going to be fighting... Historic NY Sunday #9
which more or less flies in the face - of the incessant hue and cry that we are currently stopdiggin Sunday #10
these people haven't REALLY been 'party' supporters - for a long, long time stopdiggin Sunday #11
Who are "these people" you refer to? luv2fly Sunday #14
interesting, isn't it? Skittles Sunday #15
The timing seems a bit off. mzmolly Sunday #34
those that (repeatedly) tell us that "they cannot vote for" - a Democrat, or a party stopdiggin Sunday #45
Winning elections isn't so important for those who think both sides are the same. Taking over the Democratic Party betsuni Sunday #17
"For the American people it can be the difference between life and death right now, here in the reality based world." mzmolly Sunday #43
They party bashers have cost us elections and when they do they don't regret it one bit. creeksneakers2 Sunday #13
Who are "they [sic] party bashers" you reference? luv2fly Sunday #16
Jill Stein voters SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #18
In the context of the OP, I suspect that's inaccurate. n/t luv2fly Sunday #21
Why? SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #22
Those who don't understand how change happens mzmolly Sunday #49
You mean those like Barack Obama? Who Maru Kitteh Sunday #56
What? mzmolly Sunday #60
7 years in the state senate and half a US Senate term? dpibel Sunday #62
Incremental change and compromise as a sin -- but Social Security, Medicare, ACA, all progress -- incremental. betsuni Sunday #59
such a good point bigtree Sunday #66
Nobody is forcing them to do anything creeksneakers2 Sunday #53
This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity Sunday #19
I think the GOP is just fine with an appeaser like Schumer in leadership 617Blue Sunday #20
what did he 'appease' on during the historic legislative advancements during Biden's term? bigtree Sunday #24
"petrified of a Leader like .." You can't seriously BELIEVE ....? stopdiggin Sunday #46
Right-wing can relax, attacking the Democratic Party is being done for them. betsuni Sunday #23
the pattern was set in the last presidential election. bigtree Sunday #28
Republicans couldn't have so successfully demonized government and Democrats without all the help. betsuni Sunday #37
nailed it. what is 100% predictable - is there will be SOMETHING to be 'outraged and disappointed' about in the stopdiggin Sunday #50
Long Live That Mess We Call Democracy Emile Sunday #25
Republicans are happy to watch fawning cheerleaders attack their fellow Democrats Orrex Sunday #26
Sorry, but Democrats do a great job of sabotaging the best election chances they have with conciliatory leaders lees1975 Sunday #29
it's not about what republicans think, but you should care that they're smirking from the WH bigtree Sunday #42
I guess "Schumer is doing great and you're stupid and a bad Democrat Scrivener7 Sunday #32
Spot on! demmiblue Sunday #67
Exactly, and very well said! MineralMan Sunday #35
What are we talking about here, and why? displacedvermoter Sunday #38
a resurgence of shitstirring over the Dem leadership bigtree Sunday #41
Democrats in Disarray displacedvermoter Sunday #47
This you? dpibel Sunday #63
It basically boils down to: "Someone disagreed with me on the internet." demmiblue Sunday #44
while doing a pretty darned good job of coherently laying out their OWN points and opinion ... stopdiggin Sunday #51
Oh. Is it "Now Is Not The Time!" Bingo season already? Sympthsical Sunday #40
while the insistant (and oh so VOCAL) opposition has gained us .. ? (FFS) stopdiggin Sunday #52
Maritime advice from people who always steer full speed into the ice field Sympthsical Sunday #57
equally delusional - are those that continue to insist that we're going to win back stopdiggin Sunday #58
If only I could rec your reply 50 times. Orrex Yesterday #73
I guess it depends on who you want to get to the polls. Phoenix61 Sunday #48
this is the holy grail bigtree Sunday #61
Except they see Jeffries and Schumer as the face of the Dem party Phoenix61 Sunday #68
like I said bigtree Sunday #69
Well if they're going to do it i prefer now as opposed to SSJVegeta Sunday #54
As much as we like or dislike our political leaders, they are elected by their constituants walkingman Sunday #55
It's become obvious to me MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #64
anyone who knows me here bigtree Sunday #65
"The candidates didn't fail to resonate with voters; the voters failed to resonate with the candidates." Orrex Sunday #70
Jeffries stands up to Trump, says to shut his mouth before someone gets killed (strongly worded fighting spirit) betsuni Yesterday #71
You know, you're right. Orrex Yesterday #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans will be more ...»Reply #36