Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

B.See

(8,537 posts)
16. I know when the 14th was ratified
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 04:27 PM
Wednesday

and also of the arguments against birthright citizenship for Black people in the 1860's.

But yes, mortifying for a variety of reasons. From the article I referenced:

“I think that what Black people need to wake up to is that all of these little attacks on DEI on birthright, what they are all meant to do is to allow government institutions to question who, other than white people, belongs in this society with full citizenship rights,” Dr. Alvin Tillery, a professor of political science at Northwestern University, told theGrio.

Tillery, who is also the director of the Center for the Study of Diversity and Democracy, warned that the “next logical extension” of Trump’s theory on birthright citizenship is that “the framers of the Constitution never really meant for Black people to be citizens.” He continued, “If we can overturn the 14th Amendment, birthright citizenship, doesn’t that also apply to the Blacks? That’s where they will be headed. And so we need to join those efforts vigorously to protect birthright citizenship as Black people.”


But then again, I've been saying (warning) for quite some time, that presumptive, arrogant, privileged racists like Trump NEVER considered Black people to be "real Americans."

Her certainly never thought Obama was. And some of us, at least, were able to read between the lines.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why are they even hearing this case? [View all] boston bean Wednesday OP
At least they are giving Sauer the drumming he deserves--no matter how quickly & emphatically hlthe2b Wednesday #1
Natural born Gish Galloper... haele Wednesday #7
They are hearing it Boo1 Wednesday #2
Only sitting president to ever sit in on scotus oral arguments... spanone Wednesday #3
You can thank the creators and backers of the Project 2025.... FarPoint Wednesday #4
Agreed JustAnotherGen Wednesday #5
I agree. I don't know what THF is, but this obsession with Israel is tearing up apart. LeftInTX Wednesday #13
THF - The Heritage Foundation JustAnotherGen Thursday #23
The government's argument is all about intent of the parent to stay in the US Buckeyeblue Wednesday #6
Well, there goes selling those special expensive vacation packages haele Wednesday #8
Not to mention the pregnant wives and mistresses B.See Wednesday #17
Admittedly, I never went to law school EnergizedLib Wednesday #9
probably for the same reason they took up the immunity case...... lastlib Wednesday #10
exactly. B.See Wednesday #12
Why are they using a Civil War era supremacist's B.See Wednesday #11
14th was ratified in 1868. maxsolomon Wednesday #14
Thank you. H2O Man Wednesday #15
I know when the 14th was ratified B.See Wednesday #16
Sorry if I offended you. I was trying to agree with you. maxsolomon Wednesday #18
Wasn't offended because B.See Wednesday #20
It's a matter of how slippery slopes are. maxsolomon Wednesday #21
Yes. Certain citizens. Denaturalize B.See Wednesday #22
Because various braying Nazi horses' behinds on the court think they'll seem brilliant and powerful struggle4progress Wednesday #19
Why? Because at least four members of the Court agreed that the case should be heard onenote Thursday #24
D'uh. That is missing the question. boston bean Thursday #25
Probably because the justices want to resolve the issue for sake of judicial economy onenote Thursday #26
Agreed. n/t Ms. Toad Thursday #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why are they even hearing...»Reply #16