Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

B.See

(8,532 posts)

17. Not to mention the pregnant wives and mistresses

Reply to haele (Reply #8)

Wed Apr 1, 2026, 04:45 PM

Wednesday

of wealthy Russian oligarchs, who were put up and pampered (at a profit) in posh Trump Miami resorts, to give birth to dual citizenship babies. (Look it up.)

But not to worry. There will be some hocus pocus 'loophole'... correction... 'exceptions' for them.

Like that old commercial once said, "membership has its PRIVILEGES."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why are they even hearing this case? [View all] boston bean Wednesday OP

At least they are giving Sauer the drumming he deserves--no matter how quickly & emphatically hlthe2b Wednesday #1

Natural born Gish Galloper... haele Wednesday #7

They are hearing it Boo1 Wednesday #2

Only sitting president to ever sit in on scotus oral arguments... spanone Wednesday #3

You can thank the creators and backers of the Project 2025.... FarPoint Wednesday #4

Agreed JustAnotherGen Wednesday #5

I agree. I don't know what THF is, but this obsession with Israel is tearing up apart. LeftInTX Wednesday #13

THF - The Heritage Foundation JustAnotherGen Thursday #23

The government's argument is all about intent of the parent to stay in the US Buckeyeblue Wednesday #6

Well, there goes selling those special expensive vacation packages haele Wednesday #8

Not to mention the pregnant wives and mistresses B.See Wednesday #17

Admittedly, I never went to law school EnergizedLib Wednesday #9

probably for the same reason they took up the immunity case...... lastlib Wednesday #10

exactly. B.See Wednesday #12

Why are they using a Civil War era supremacist's B.See Wednesday #11

14th was ratified in 1868. maxsolomon Wednesday #14

Thank you. H2O Man Wednesday #15

I know when the 14th was ratified B.See Wednesday #16

Sorry if I offended you. I was trying to agree with you. maxsolomon Wednesday #18

Wasn't offended because B.See Wednesday #20

It's a matter of how slippery slopes are. maxsolomon Wednesday #21

Yes. Certain citizens. Denaturalize B.See Wednesday #22

Because various braying Nazi horses' behinds on the court think they'll seem brilliant and powerful struggle4progress Wednesday #19

Why? Because at least four members of the Court agreed that the case should be heard onenote Thursday #24

D'uh. That is missing the question. boston bean Thursday #25

Probably because the justices want to resolve the issue for sake of judicial economy onenote Thursday #26

Agreed. n/t Ms. Toad Thursday #27