Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BComplex

(9,917 posts)

13. No, for two reasons.

Reply to Qutzupalotl (Reply #12)

Wed Apr 1, 2026, 05:14 PM

Wednesday

One: Trump really drank his own kool-aid and believed he would beat Joe Biden.

Two: The guy who was put in charge of elections security, Chris Krebs, was there to insure a completely safe vote. He should have also been in charge when Kamala Harris ran, too, but he wasn't. Trump fired him between the election and when Joe Biden took office in January.

Joe and Kamala failed to make sure the election was unhackable. We should focus on that from now on out. ALL of us!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

littlemissmartypants lrucks1952

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FINALLY, Thank you Nancy Pelosi [View all] 4bonhoffer Wednesday OP

This thread is wrong gab13by13 Wednesday #1

Agreed bamagal62 Wednesday #2

If you mean they already cheat I agree. 58Sunliner Wednesday #4

So did Clinton. And FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #6

She is the right person to raise the issue, and to raise it in this way RockCreek Wednesday #3

They're going to cheat their asses off..... SergeStorms Wednesday #5

NO!!! Voting in massive numbers is NOT a remedy for PROGRAMMED voting machines! BComplex Wednesday #7

REC a thousand times. Amaryllis Wednesday #9

The more people who vote,... SpankMe Wednesday #11

Did they try it in 2020? Qutzupalotl Wednesday #12

No, for two reasons. BComplex Wednesday #13

There's hand counting paper ballots in full public view questionseverything Wednesday #15

Can white hat hackers detect this kind of malevolent intent? electric_blue68 Thursday #17

I have no doubt that it could be detected. The algorithm that was used, however, BComplex 23 hrs ago #20

Uh, oh. I guess constantly monitoring? electric_blue68 20 hrs ago #23

Where is she talking about this? I want to read it. Been following Palast since the 2004 election was stolen. Amaryllis Wednesday #8

That's what I want to know. littlemissmartypants Thursday #16

Pointing this out is not enough. Even if every elected official points this out, it is not enough. The missing PatrickforB Wednesday #10

My understanding of the way hacking works... returnee Wednesday #14

the Dem 'leadership' didn't ignore attempts to manipulate the vote. They fucking impeached Trump for it bigtree Thursday #18

Sad part is, NOBODY here can say 100% if anything happened the last election. Everybody here has their own thoughts bluestarone Thursday #19

Except when all the evidence points to the election being accurate EdmondDantes_ 23 hrs ago #21

But, see, they didn't "like" Hillary. And Kamala wasn't the best choice. MineralMan 23 hrs ago #22