Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

maxsolomon

(38,749 posts)
18. Sorry if I offended you. I was trying to agree with you.
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 05:17 PM
Wednesday

Alvin Tillery is slippery-sloping this. I'm just tired of slippery-sloping. They're not coming for native-born black Americans next.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why are they even hearing this case? [View all] boston bean Wednesday OP
At least they are giving Sauer the drumming he deserves--no matter how quickly & emphatically hlthe2b Wednesday #1
Natural born Gish Galloper... haele Wednesday #7
They are hearing it Boo1 Wednesday #2
Only sitting president to ever sit in on scotus oral arguments... spanone Wednesday #3
You can thank the creators and backers of the Project 2025.... FarPoint Wednesday #4
Agreed JustAnotherGen Wednesday #5
I agree. I don't know what THF is, but this obsession with Israel is tearing up apart. LeftInTX Wednesday #13
THF - The Heritage Foundation JustAnotherGen Thursday #23
The government's argument is all about intent of the parent to stay in the US Buckeyeblue Wednesday #6
Well, there goes selling those special expensive vacation packages haele Wednesday #8
Not to mention the pregnant wives and mistresses B.See Wednesday #17
Admittedly, I never went to law school EnergizedLib Wednesday #9
probably for the same reason they took up the immunity case...... lastlib Wednesday #10
exactly. B.See Wednesday #12
Why are they using a Civil War era supremacist's B.See Wednesday #11
14th was ratified in 1868. maxsolomon Wednesday #14
Thank you. H2O Man Wednesday #15
I know when the 14th was ratified B.See Wednesday #16
Sorry if I offended you. I was trying to agree with you. maxsolomon Wednesday #18
Wasn't offended because B.See Wednesday #20
It's a matter of how slippery slopes are. maxsolomon Wednesday #21
Yes. Certain citizens. Denaturalize B.See Wednesday #22
Because various braying Nazi horses' behinds on the court think they'll seem brilliant and powerful struggle4progress Wednesday #19
Why? Because at least four members of the Court agreed that the case should be heard onenote Thursday #24
D'uh. That is missing the question. boston bean Thursday #25
Probably because the justices want to resolve the issue for sake of judicial economy onenote Thursday #26
Agreed. n/t Ms. Toad Thursday #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why are they even hearing...»Reply #18