Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The validity of the public debt of the U.S.....shall not be questioned (14th Amendment) [View all]Igel
(35,293 posts)35. No, purchases on credit is debt.
I can authorize all kinds of spending, but until the money's spent there's no debt whatsoever.
And if I'm an employer and tell my employee to spend money that we don't have, he can't sign for a bank loan. He can't spend what's not there. It's delegated authority, and it's limited by a lot of things.
To go back to a poster quite a ways upstream, if authorization to spend also implies authorization to borrow, why doesn't it also imply authorization to tax? They're three separate powers. They can be wielded in arbitrary and unpredictable ways, but that doesn't mean that they suddenly merge.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations