Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ms. Toad

(38,713 posts)

9. Curious how they got that 91% accuracy figure.

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Thu Apr 9, 2026, 10:49 AM

Apr 9

I have yet to find a single completely accurate summary.

Is be willing to believe that 91% of individual facts are accurate - but not that 91% of summaries are.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

benfranklin1776

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Analysis Finds That Google's AI Overviews Are Providing Misinformation at a Scale Possibly Unprecedented in History [View all] highplainsdem Apr 9 OP

An automated... 2naSalit Apr 9 #1

Yes benfranklin1776 Apr 9 #2

Exactly. 2naSalit Apr 9 #5

Devolution in action. benfranklin1776 Friday #11

"cognitive surrender" is nothing new to the far right eShirl Apr 9 #3

Money.... OhioBack2Blue Apr 9 #4

My posts on a forum on the internet are referenced by Google AI sanatanadharma Apr 9 #6

I'm seeing that, as well. MineralMan Apr 9 #8

I've noticed w/both google & bing - TBF Apr 9 #7

Curious how they got that 91% accuracy figure. Ms. Toad Apr 9 #9

91% is certainly more accurate than anything coming out of RW media. Chakaconcarne Apr 9 #10