Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
28. well, this is the defense of and for his expressed willingness to cut it from
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 09:33 AM
Jan 2013

those who either lack the mental acuity required to resolve his actually doing so and a willingness to do so into the two separate and distinct things they are, or lacking the intellectual honesty to concede that they are.

The whole idea you see, is to blunt the criticism of his having offered that particular sacrificial lamb and what it says about his status or position on the ideological spectrum, by claiming that it is unreasonable and irrational to take him at his word. Apparently only the "loony left" does that. This dishonesty is of course understandable, as well as the use of the Lucy analogy, "N" dimensional chess, etc, -- they don't want our allegedly "liberal" president having his legacy tarnished even by the willingness to cut SS.

So, in typical impotent fashion, they attack the messengers in lieu of any defense of or for the message BHO himself delivered, and find themselves remaining wholly incapable of presenting cause beyond stupid analogies as to why fears and concerns that SS may be touched by this president are unreasonable and irrational.

That's been the case with every one of them I've locked horns with over the last few months on the issue. There's nothing irrational or unreasonable about fears or concerns over what he says he'll consider/has offered to do, and their "NUH UH" arguments are worthy of the playground. It's all concerted bluster and BS on their part intended to obscure the fact that they have no way of hiding the fact that he put SS on the chopping block, and all these posts like this one are merely dishonest dodges and an effort to change the subject to those like you and I.

It makes dishonest weaklings of them all imo.

Wow, imagine that -- we're loons for taking BHO literally and at his word. Apparently we must be "loony lefties" for not calling him a liar instead. By their standard, and what they're really arguing for, is that this irrational and unreasonable threat to SS some of us feel is really just a "the ends justify the means" type lie Saint Raygun honed into an artform. In other words, they want us to accept being lied to, and to figure out when we are and aren't being lied to.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's not over... kentuck Jan 2013 #1
But did we cut Social Security? WonderGrunion Jan 2013 #2
If the Fiscal Cliff Crisis ended with today's vote, you'd be right. MessiahRp Jan 2013 #3
I see lots of folks posting that they see from 'so many' stuff like 'absolutely double dog' and that Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #6
So when you say 'I heard from many' you really mean 'I am making up shit I never saw and can Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #7
You are kidding. Do you not read DU? Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #15
OP can offer up any single quote that says the shit he claims he sees from 'many'. Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #38
Yes, exactly. No deal has been made, it's only... JackRiddler Jan 2013 #27
Chained CPI customerserviceguy Jan 2013 #4
No. demwing Jan 2013 #5
The fiscal cliff was originally pushed for by Obama as a way of implementing SS reform Leopolds Ghost Jan 2013 #8
Yep. The MIC developed a PERT Network for cutting plethoro Jan 2013 #24
PERT network? Sounds intriguing Leopolds Ghost Jan 2013 #42
The prediction that Obama will cut Social Security will pop back up JoePhilly Jan 2013 #9
Never occurred to Joe that the outrage from the actual Left had some effect. Never will. nt Bonobo Jan 2013 #11
"Obama is going to cave and cut Social Security!!!!!" JoePhilly Jan 2013 #12
Well cheerleading like a schmuck sure doesn't help. nt Bonobo Jan 2013 #17
If you go back over my posts on this topic, you'll find my predicted outcome is JoePhilly Jan 2013 #31
Good post brush Jan 2013 #20
That is exactly what it was. It was the Democrats that understood the threat and who plethoro Jan 2013 #25
The GOP is going to attack again, no matter what happened, its what they do. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #32
White House to libruls. "Fuck Them" (NYT article, 1/2/13) jerseyjack Jan 2013 #10
Or even give the link. How kind of you to save us the time. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #16
Did the debt ceiling get raised? vi5 Jan 2013 #13
That comes in two months...... bowens43 Jan 2013 #14
Never is a very long time MNBrewer Jan 2013 #18
Actually, by letting the payroll tax holiday expire we have strengthened it. Motown_Johnny Jan 2013 #19
Yes CranialRectaLoopback Jan 2013 #21
So do you mean I can stop calling and writing the WH and my reps about it now? forestpath Jan 2013 #22
well, this is the defense of and for his expressed willingness to cut it from stupidicus Jan 2013 #28
Yep. Especially because, when Obama does put it back on the table, they will forestpath Jan 2013 #35
No, folks should continue to do that. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #33
Why? Because it bugs you? What difference does that make? Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #39
And during that DADT effort ... there was a loud group on DU claiming JoePhilly Jan 2013 #40
WTF!!! Obama is the one that put SS on the table. The Democrats in Congress took it away. Dawgs Jan 2013 #23
Is it so hard for people to actually think that the WH and Congress(dem side) might actually Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2013 #29
This isn't Schrödinger's cat we're talking about MNBrewer Jan 2013 #34
No. nt bemildred Jan 2013 #26
No, but that doesn't stop the ODSers to find something else to go after the Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #30
Our President just cleaned the Republicans clock CentristLiberal Jan 2013 #36
As everywhere, those who are most upset post the most and loudest. uppityperson Jan 2013 #37
it's a mistake to focus so much on personality Enrique Jan 2013 #41
No, Obama did however put it on the table Autumn Jan 2013 #43
+1 forestpath Jan 2013 #44
no "all" we did was create permanent tax cuts for the rich hfojvt Jan 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The "Fiscal Cliff&qu...»Reply #28