Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is Swalwell being rat fucked? (Poll) [View all]Bluetus
(2,913 posts)14. No. I mean like character assassination
Anybody can make a charge. Everybody is entitled to a fair trial if the charges are seen to have any merit.
This is obviously not about a rape. If it was, then the charges should have been filed at the time. When they are brought up in an obvious attempt to alter the outcome of an election, we should all be very skeptical.
Why was this not brought up on 2019?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Huh? Every member of the House is only currently serving through the end of the year.
Wiz Imp
13 hrs ago
#72
He's not every member of the house. He's a guy who screwed up big time and will be out of politics altogether soon.
Attilatheblond
9 hrs ago
#78
You seem to be shadow boxing for no particular reason. I don't disagree that he is still in the House but he's DONE
Attilatheblond
6 hrs ago
#84
No, this goes to judgement, which he showed very little of!! He put himself in the position to be blackmailed,
Pisces
23 hrs ago
#57
Option 6: When this shit comes up in the middle of a campaign, we should be very skeptical
Bluetus
Yesterday
#9
"This is obviously not about a rape." I...would not say that's obvious.
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#16
"They have had nine years to speak up and they chose this particular moment to bring a charge?"
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#34
You are seriously asking a question regarding why sexual assault is (commonly/frequently) not reported?
stopdiggin
Yesterday
#19
He is being investigated by the Manhattan District Attorney's office
DemocratSinceBirth
23 hrs ago
#50
there are people with inside knowledge (within his own campaign?) that appear to be
stopdiggin
Yesterday
#22
Hey DU peeps who are smarter than me re the internets. I caught a brief statement supposedly made by Roger Stone
Ninga
Yesterday
#21
Because journalists were reporting out the allegations. It takes weeks to months to nail a story like this down, and it
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#23
You need an option for "He should drop out of the Governor's race, but stay in his Congressional seat until...
LudwigPastorius
Yesterday
#25
Im just curious on those believing this is a set up - have you read the SF Cheonicle and/or CNN reporting
Nanjeanne
Yesterday
#35
If it's not ratfucking, the accusers should go to the authorities rather than the media.
W_HAMILTON
23 hrs ago
#49
It's not a double standard. Then statute of limitations had expired and it was pre-Me Too.
W_HAMILTON
23 hrs ago
#58
Some of the SOL's are only 5 years, and it takes victims time to emotionally process these things.
pnwmom
21 hrs ago
#65
The original victim didn't go to authorities because she didn't think they'd believe her. And the media came to her.
WhiskeyGrinder
14 hrs ago
#71
Well, it sure looks like lots believe her snd support her, so now she should go to the police.
W_HAMILTON
10 hrs ago
#75