Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Food for thought... ultralite001 Saturday #1
Option 5: Did he ratfuck himself? leftstreet Saturday #2
If he and his wife made nice after whatever it was he did Attilatheblond Saturday #7
He's still in the House. Wiz Imp Saturday #52
Short timer, so not really still in Attilatheblond Saturday #54
Huh? Every member of the House is only currently serving through the end of the year. Wiz Imp Yesterday #72
He's not every member of the house. He's a guy who screwed up big time and will be out of politics altogether soon. Attilatheblond 21 hrs ago #78
Sheesh. And until then, he is still a member of the House of Representatives. Wiz Imp 21 hrs ago #82
You seem to be shadow boxing for no particular reason. I don't disagree that he is still in the House but he's DONE Attilatheblond 18 hrs ago #84
Wow. You started by saying Wiz Imp 18 hrs ago #85
No, this goes to judgement, which he showed very little of!! He put himself in the position to be blackmailed, Pisces Saturday #57
Option 6: When this shit comes up in the middle of a campaign, we should be very skeptical Bluetus Saturday #9
"this shit." You mean like rape? leftstreet Saturday #10
No. I mean like character assassination Bluetus Saturday #14
"This is obviously not about a rape." I...would not say that's obvious. WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #16
I understand there are reasons people don't like to speak up. Bluetus Saturday #29
"They have had nine years to speak up and they chose this particular moment to bring a charge?" WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #34
You are seriously asking a question regarding why sexual assault is (commonly/frequently) not reported? stopdiggin Saturday #19
Don't be a reactionary, putting words in my mouth. Bluetus Saturday #30
At least one of the alleged assaults was in 2024. nt pnwmom Saturday #44
He is being investigated by the Manhattan District Attorney's office DemocratSinceBirth Saturday #50
Sigh n/t leftstreet Saturday #20
He allegedly sent unsolicited dick picks DemocratSinceBirth Saturday #39
If true, that should be disqualifying Bluetus Saturday #46
Snapchat deletes messages so no EdmondDantes_ Saturday #60
There are some related facts that appear to have been corroborated. pnwmom Saturday #43
Jean Carroll didn't bring up her being assaulted until years lster onenote Saturday #47
And that weighed heavily against her charges Bluetus Saturday #48
Christine Blasey Ford tulipsandroses Saturday #32
Not enough info MustLoveBeagles Saturday #3
Yeah. What a coincidence!! FoxNewsSucks Saturday #6
Maybe his ego has been getting the best of him. n/t pnwmom Yesterday #63
That's possible MustLoveBeagles Yesterday #67
Not enough VERIFIED info yet. FoxNewsSucks Saturday #4
Read more if you want to see more corroboration. It's out there. pnwmom Yesterday #66
Mr Swalwell knows what he did and didn't do mike_c Saturday #5
I have no idea PATRICK Saturday #8
Can't be sure. I always take such allegations seriously mvd Saturday #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Saturday #12
I am suspicious of the timing mcar Saturday #13
"The timing seems suspicious" WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #15
Excellent point SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #17
I'm leaning to No. But not enough information yet. RandomNumbers Saturday #18
there are people with inside knowledge (within his own campaign?) that appear to be stopdiggin Saturday #22
Hey DU peeps who are smarter than me re the internets. I caught a brief statement supposedly made by Roger Stone Ninga Saturday #21
Because journalists were reporting out the allegations. It takes weeks to months to nail a story like this down, and it WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #23
Ok I understand. Appreciate your response. I still Ninga Saturday #26
better now than after the primary WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #27
It was being posted by people on Instagram for a prolonged period EdmondDantes_ Saturday #61
Roger Stone also seems to have "Democratic insider info". LeftInTX 21 hrs ago #80
I don't know but I do think the response should be to look into JI7 Saturday #24
You need an option for "He should drop out of the Governor's race, but stay in his Congressional seat until... LudwigPastorius Saturday #25
I would like to see some evidence released pinkstarburst Saturday #28
Absofuckingloutely! He was very vocal against slob post 1/6 & beyond. SheltieLover Saturday #31
Throw him off the bus. Let his next potential employer figure it out. hunter Saturday #33
Im just curious on those believing this is a set up - have you read the SF Cheonicle and/or CNN reporting Nanjeanne Saturday #35
Swalwell has a sterling record. Kid Berwyn Saturday #36
Does he? Fiendish Thingy Saturday #42
He did that in the open. Kid Berwyn Saturday #45
1.) Al Franken Was About A Photo. 2.) Eric's Defense Is 2-Fold:..... ColoringFool Saturday #37
You are wrong about Franken 8 different women accused him EdmondDantes_ Saturday #62
This message was self-deleted by its author standingtall Yesterday #70
Serious allegations. Skepticism warranted. Bobstandard Saturday #38
I want to hear the allegations made under oath. orangecrush Saturday #59
The timing makes me suspicious Orangenero Saturday #40
To believe this is ratfuckery is to suspend reality Fiendish Thingy Saturday #41
Fiendish Thingy mr715 Saturday #51
Tom Steyer is a billionaire TexasBushwhacker Saturday #53
I'm not pointing fingers Fiendish Thingy Saturday #56
If it's not ratfucking, the accusers should go to the authorities rather than the media. W_HAMILTON Saturday #49
Double standard? onenote Saturday #55
It's not a double standard. Then statute of limitations had expired and it was pre-Me Too. W_HAMILTON Saturday #58
Some of the SOL's are only 5 years, and it takes victims time to emotionally process these things. pnwmom Yesterday #65
Except they've gone to CNN -- surely they can go to the police. W_HAMILTON 22 hrs ago #73
They did go to the police DemocratSinceBirth 21 hrs ago #79
Easy for a man to say. nt pnwmom Yesterday #64
It ain't just men asking why they can go to CNN but not the police. W_HAMILTON 22 hrs ago #74
The patriarchy harms everyone EdmondDantes_ 21 hrs ago #81
They didn't go to CNN. CNN went to them. And Manhattan prosecutors pnwmom 15 hrs ago #86
The original victim didn't go to authorities because she didn't think they'd believe her. And the media came to her. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #71
Well, it sure looks like lots believe her snd support her, so now she should go to the police. W_HAMILTON 22 hrs ago #75
The Manhattan DA has opened an investigation, so she may have. WhiskeyGrinder 22 hrs ago #76
damn victims Cirsium 22 hrs ago #77
The Manhattan prosecutors office IS investigating. nt pnwmom 15 hrs ago #87
I don't know. hamsterjill Yesterday #68
I think it's to distract from the Melania thing. LeftInTX Yesterday #69
He's toast. underpants 20 hrs ago #83
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Swalwell being rat fuc...»Reply #40