Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,613 posts)
9. More from the article:
Tue Apr 14, 2026, 12:00 PM
Tuesday

snip

The Prospect contacted all members of the leadership of the CBC and Rep. Meeks to seek comment on the decision to support a clean reauthorization of Section 702. None of them responded before press time. Hours after press time, Rep. Meeks responded, claiming that “I support FISA reauthorization, but the only vote I’ve been whipping is my War Powers Resolution to end the war in Iran. Whip operations are traditionally conducted by the Ranking Member of the committee that has jurisdiction over the legislation being considered. Any claim that I’m whipping the CBC on FISA is false.”

The story does not say that Rep. Meeks is whipping a vote, as that has a specific meaning in the context of Congress. It says that he convinced the CBC to support a clean reauthorization. That reporting has gone unchallenged.

snip

So influential are the intelligence agencies that rely on Section 702 that they have managed to cow a long-standing reformist, CBC chairwoman Yvette Clarke (D-NY).

In 2010, Clarke opposed Section 702 on the grounds that renewal of the act would create “a precedent under which we will see the creation of a system that uses the private sector as a de facto spying agency for the government.” Since 2010, Clarke has consistently voted to pass broad reforms restricting Section 702’s reach, and voted against reauthorizing the power the last time it came before Congress in 2024.

snip

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Primary every one of these GOP-enablers leftstreet Tuesday #1
this is not a GOP thing stopdiggin Tuesday #4
Do Democrats want warrantless spying? leftstreet Tuesday #6
have they backed FISA (in similar clean bills) in the past? stopdiggin Tuesday #7
This is about Section 702 leftstreet Tuesday #8
any yet, as I noted, bipartisan objections to backdoors and abuses not withstanding - FISA stopdiggin Tuesday #13
Parimary every last one of them, should be no no warrantless spying...sorry. Demsrule86 Tuesday #10
dont want to look 'soft on crime'. mopinko Tuesday #2
That is f'ing racist...what is wrong with them? Demsrule86 19 hrs ago #22
Disappointing, but Meeks and Himes should be blamed as much EdmondDantes_ Tuesday #3
Yeah. Strange. Congressional Black Caucus really has little to do with this issue. stopdiggin Tuesday #5
More from the article: Celerity Tuesday #9
and I continue to say, what possible motivation/justification in HIGHLIGHTING stopdiggin Tuesday #14
see post 15 Celerity 23 hrs ago #18
Yes! Together with headlines reading "CBC playing coy - - Reportedly siding with Trump .. " stopdiggin 20 hrs ago #19
I disagree with your framing attempts, but I am going to leave it there and just agree to disagree. Celerity 19 hrs ago #20
respect your right to disagree. but, to my mind, continues to be an absolutely blatant case ... stopdiggin 19 hrs ago #21
Tell Congress to let this terrible law expire. -- Indivisible usonian Tuesday #11
The daily "get mad at Democrats" MorbidButterflyTat Tuesday #12
some Congressional Black Caucus have just signed a letter pledging to deny the GOP decisive House votes Passages Yesterday #15
great news, thank you Celerity 23 hrs ago #16
You're welcome. Passages 23 hrs ago #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congressional Black Caucu...»Reply #9