Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 02:21 PM Jan 2013

Why did a Train Carrying Biofuel Cross the Border 24 Times and Never Unload? [View all]

A cargo train filled with biofuels crossed the border between the US and Canada 24 times between the 15th of June and the 28th of June 2010; not once did it unload its cargo, yet it still earned millions of dollars. CBC News of Canada was the first to pick up on this story on the 3rd of December 2012, and began their own investigation into the possible explanations behind this odd behaviour.

<snip>

The cargo of the train was owned by Bioversal Trading Inc., or its US partner Verdero, depending on what stage of the trip it was at. The companies “made several million dollars importing and exporting the fuel to exploit a loophole in a U.S. green energy program.” Each time the loaded train crossed the border the cargo earned its owner a certain amount of Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs), which were awarded by the US EPA to “promote and track production and importation of renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel.” The RINs were supposed to be retired each time the shipment passed the border, but due to a glitch not all of them were. This enabled Bioversal to accumulate over 12 million RINs from the 24 trips, worth between 50 cents and $1 each, which they can then sell on to oil companies that haven’t met the EPA’s renewable fuel requirements.

Read more: http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Why-did-a-Train-Carrying-Biofuel-Cross-the-Border-24-Times-and-Never-Unload.html

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
i'm not a lawyer, but i'm pretty sure this is illegal tax evasion. unblock Jan 2013 #1
One would think. There's a fraud investigation in progress. PETRUS Jan 2013 #2
And what do you expect companies involved in breaking the law to say? awake Jan 2013 #3
"I'll be right back!" as they climb out the bathroom window. Robb Jan 2013 #11
Illegal immigration, too, I think. alp227 Jan 2013 #20
grrrrrrrrrrrr DonRedwood Jan 2013 #4
Right wingers blaming Obama for this in 3-2-1... jmowreader Jan 2013 #5
Of course! Plucketeer Jan 2013 #6
Do you hear that gavel, maybe faint, but it's a'commin', as we are drynberg Jan 2013 #7
There are no depths they will not go... ReRe Jan 2013 #8
Don't regulate nineteen50 Jan 2013 #9
Here's the CBC story. Brickbat Jan 2013 #10
sure sounds like the EPA is compromised Celebration Jan 2013 #12
I wonder if the guy who thought this up will get to keep his bonus now that they're caught. Robb Jan 2013 #13
Life in prison for them all Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #14
Gaming the system like this ought to be worth some jail time. Scuba Jan 2013 #15
^ Wilms Jan 2013 #16
To get to the other side? Oops wrong joke Autumn Jan 2013 #17
This whole thing about "offsets" trading arikara Jan 2013 #18
I don't think that's what Adam Smith hsad in mind. Faryn Balyncd Jan 2013 #19
Deregulation of the train’s side of the road was threatening its dominant market position. slackmaster Jan 2013 #21
k & R! nt wildbilln864 Jan 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did a Train Carrying ...