Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sympthsical

(11,059 posts)
4. Being discussed doesn't mean planned
Sun Apr 26, 2026, 07:34 PM
Sunday

There's always been a little bit of a debate about it. Particularly during the 19th Century, American republican architecture and D.C.'s perpetual half-finished character were compared against the glittering courts of Europe and found lacking. This kind of smarted with a certain segment of the American upper class, particularly the nouveau riche who felt socially insecure.

But as soon as the idea got tossed around, it was dismissed. It was always viewed as an extravagance that grated against the character of American republicanism compared to the opulence of monarchy. Once the modern White House took shape, it became kind of pointless. The State Dining Room has been considered sufficient. Mix in that most people just assumed it would require some semblance of Congressional approval and cooperation.

Trump's the only jackass who decided, "Let's unilaterally demolish a wing for this bit of tacky garishness no one needs."

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I asked Google: "How many...»Reply #4