Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,649 posts)
22. in short
Fri May 15, 2026, 12:40 AM
Yesterday

The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act would make it harder for states to pass new voter ID laws in jurisdictions with a history of discrimination, requiring federal approval before such changes take effect.

Preclearance

Geographic coverage: The John Lewis Act creates a new framework to determine which states and localities will be subject to preclearance. Under the requirement, jurisdictions with a history of voting discrimination must get approval from the Department of Justice or a federal court in Washington, DC, before changing their voting laws or practices to ensure that the changes are not discriminatory. In Shelby County, the Supreme Court struck down the Voting Rights Act’s preclearance formula, saying it was outdated. The bill updates the formula to ensure that state and local coverage is based on recent evidence of discrimination.

Practice-based coverage: The John Lewis Act makes some types of voting changes subject to preclearance nationwide, if certain conditions are met, because those changes are so often discriminatory. The following practices would be covered:

Creating at-large districts in places with sufficiently large minority populations.
Changing jurisdiction boundaries to remove minorities from the jurisdiction in places with sufficiently large minority populations.
Changing the boundaries of a district where a minority group is sufficiently large and has had a large population increase.
Imposing stricter requirements for documentation or proof of identity to vote.
Reducing the availability of or altering multilingual voting materials.
Reducing, consolidating, or relocating polling places, early and Election Day voting opportunities, or absentee voting opportunities in places with sufficiently large minority populations.
Making it easier to remove voters from the rolls in places with sufficiently large minority populations.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/john-r-lewis-voting-rights-advancement-act

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nah bad idea only allows republicans to control the narrative standingtall Wednesday #1
The border issue was too far gone before that Bill was brought up Callie1979 Thursday #17
Problem is that a voter ID bill which requires proof of citizenship (democrats dont support allowing only citizens vote) Ms. Toad Wednesday #2
Exactly now is not the time for Democrats to sellout their constituents standingtall Wednesday #3
A poll tax would be bad enough - Ms. Toad Wednesday #4
My State will Give you a free voter ID. Every state should. Callie1979 Thursday #16
my state just asks me my name bigtree Yesterday #23
"(democrats dont support allowing only citizens vote)" MichMan Wednesday #5
I was quoting the OP Ms. Toad Wednesday #6
Sorry, I missed that MichMan Wednesday #7
It's OK. I'd have put in quote marks, but I ran out of characters in the title . . . n/t Ms. Toad Wednesday #10
Our current voter records are already well vetted. Illegal voters are very rare Callie1979 Thursday #15
Requiring "some kind of ID" does not counter the advertisements you claim will be used against Democrats Ms. Toad Thursday #19
Well, if you've got a Dem Senator running & you're in a swing state, you'll see. Callie1979 8 hrs ago #24
Do you understand that requiring an ID - EVEN a RealID - does not prove citizenship Ms. Toad 7 hrs ago #30
Democratic Party believes anyone from any country can vote in the US? I've never heard this Melon 6 hrs ago #32
First, I was quoting the advertisements the OP was afraid would be run against Democrats, Ms. Toad 3 hrs ago #34
I only questioned what you stated Melon 3 hrs ago #35
Birth certificates and social security numbers do not always exist. Ms. Toad 2 hrs ago #37
You need ID to register to vote. Quiet Em Wednesday #8
Only 12 states require an ID that proves citizenship - and most of those are very limited or no in effect. Ms. Toad Thursday #12
Noncitizens can't vote in federal elections, but in some jurisdictions, noncitizens can vote in local elections. WhiskeyGrinder Thursday #13
John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025 bigtree Wednesday #9
Thank you. As always, Democrats have done or are trying to do what they're accused of not doing or wanting to do. betsuni Wednesday #11
This has zero to do with Voter ID. Callie1979 Thursday #14
voter id is a canard bigtree Thursday #18
here, Callie (when I got out of the yard and settled down this evening...) bigtree Yesterday #21
No Karma13612 Thursday #20
in short bigtree Yesterday #22
So do some states just let ANYONE register? Callie1979 8 hrs ago #25
Never try to take a regressive issue away from the pukes LearnedHand 8 hrs ago #26
We need to have a national id. everyonematters 8 hrs ago #27
What is different with a national id? Melon 5 hrs ago #33
The states won't be able to use it as means for voter suppression since it is the federal everyonematters 2 hrs ago #36
This is a bull-shit issue that solves an imaginary problem Johonny 7 hrs ago #28
Unless all states give IDs away for free (9 currently do), it's a poll tax krawhitham 7 hrs ago #29
Not sure what that site is showing me but GA gives away a free State ID & voter ID Callie1979 6 hrs ago #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SOME Democrat PLEASE put ...»Reply #22