Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,760 posts)
11. It is the issue - both things are true
Sat May 16, 2026, 09:22 AM
51 min ago

They generally won’t mess with a state court’s interpretation of state law and/or constitution…. EXCEPT when that decision is in conflict with the federal constitution (or a federal law where the supremacy clause applies).

Which is why they tried to raise a pair of federal constitutional issues. They were pretty weak tea so they were potentially ignored regardless… but the failure to make the claim in the lower courts was a big miss that could have gotten it tossed as well

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court delivers ma...»Reply #11