Okay. First paragraph is enough. (Reply #16)

In the discussion thread: Please Help Me Craft A Response To A Tea Bagger [View all]

Thu Jan 3, 2013, 02:51 PM

Festivito (13,452 posts)

16. Okay. First paragraph is enough.

NRA and gun manufacturers make money by passing rumors that Democrats will take their rifles. Suddenly, guns and bullets fly off shelves making more money for suppliers and more ad money for gun magazines. All we need know about this that fools and their money are soon parted.

Everyone I ask about felons having guns say: no, felons should not have guns. I tell them that they just said they want gun control. That's everyone so far. Let's regulate our militia as the 2nd amendment tells us.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

40 replies	Author	Time	Post
Please Help Me Craft A Response To A Tea Bagger [View all]	SweepPicker	Jan 2013	OP
Here's my response:	Zoeisright	Jan 2013	#1
lol	SweepPicker	Jan 2013	#3
It's a stupid argument	Glitterati	Jan 2013	#2
He's right.	Recursion	Jan 2013	#4
He's obfuscating.	Cary	Jan 2013	#6
Why not just focus on handguns? Seriously?	Recursion	Jan 2013	#8
As with any other problem you wish to solve, you need to focus on the goal.	Cary	Jan 2013	#12
Nearly every rifle sold today is a semi-automatic with a detachable magazine	Recursion	Jan 2013	#14
These are different issues.	Cary	Jan 2013	#21
Yes, that a weapon being "military style" means nothing	Recursion	Jan 2013	#22
That's another canard.	Cary	Jan 2013	#23
I'm not the one hung up on "military style"	Recursion	Jan 2013	#24
Is there a rule against stating my opinion as to your motivations?	Cary	Jan 2013	#25
Right	brush	Jan 2013	#26
Automatic weapons are essentially never used in crimes	Recursion	Jan 2013	#35
Oh Yeah?	brush	Jan 2013	#37
Yeah. Glad to know you agree with me	Recursion	Jan 2013	#38
You don't call those automatic weapons?	brush	Jan 2013	#39
Of course not. They aren't automatic	Recursion	Jan 2013	#40
I saw this one too	Cary	Jan 2013	#5
This:	Iggo	Jan 2013	#7
Evidence	reteachinwi	Jan 2013	#9
rational? pretty subjective and flat wrong. Terminal ballistics...oh never mind. educate yourself	galileoreloaded	Jan 2013	#17
John Allen Mohammed and William Spengler	reteachinwi	Jan 2013	#32
He cited the (very low) rate of murders with rifles.	Recursion	Jan 2013	#10
You can run away from clubs and bats (and knives). You cannot	LeftinOH	Jan 2013	#11
How many people can be fatally wounded in a matter of seconds	Lex	Jan 2013	#13
Shouldn't he just arm and protect himself with the more leathal Bat or Hammer??	JoePhilly	Jan 2013	#15
Heh.	Lex	Jan 2013	#18
Okay. First paragraph is enough.	Festivito	Jan 2013	#16
Not since 2005. "Other than handguns" guns accounted for more murders than blunt objects.	sinkingfeeling	Jan 2013	#19
Adam Lanza did not kill 20 kids and 6 adults with a hammer or club	mnmoderatedem	Jan 2013	#20
Why are you arguing with idiots who will never change their minds? Waste of time. nt.	OldDem2012	Jan 2013	#27
Ask the moran for a link	RoccoR5955	Jan 2013	#28
You can't argue with stupid	liberal N proud	Jan 2013	#29
Baggers blow, why bother with that?	lonestarnot	Jan 2013	#30
Responding to a teabagger is like flushing your carefully crafted answer down the toilet. nt	Speck Tater	Jan 2013	#31
use simple words, maybe 2 or 3 letters each	samsingh	Jan 2013	#33
might agree with his thing about base ball bats--the chicago cubs have not been using them correctly	dembotoz	Jan 2013	#34
Did he/she go to that site?	Motown_Johnny	Jan 2013	#36

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.