Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

OGBuzz

(583 posts)

20. 100%

Reply to indusurb (Reply #19)

Sat May 16, 2026, 08:09 PM

Saturday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ahnakneemoose ahnakneemoose

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I am sick of Trump apologists always using the same bullshit nuclear argument. [View all] OGBuzz Saturday OP

Reminds me of W Bush defenders. Midnight Writer Saturday #1

Saddam was a terrible man but he was also a sworn enemy of Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda gave rise to ISIS. Bush skipped the... OGBuzz Saturday #4

Another Point On That ProfessorGAC Saturday #6

For the same reasons I don't believe that Iran has any interest in attacking the U.S., or Europe, or..... OGBuzz Saturday #11

As To Russia... ProfessorGAC Saturday #12

Their conventional military weakness is on full display in Ukraine. OGBuzz Saturday #14

Worry Is Reasonable ProfessorGAC Saturday #17

Iran has freely admitted that they are enriching uranium well beyond Melon Saturday #2

It will be Donald or Bibi who will set off the nukes. OGBuzz Saturday #5

Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear agreement. Emile Saturday #10

Trump is shit. Iran should not posses nuclear weapons. Melon Saturday #15

London! Riyadh!! Then what happens? dpibel Saturday #18

They simply did not and were not enriching it to 90%. Eko Yesterday #22

So your stance is that the enrichment to 60% is for what exactly? To scare other nations that Melon Yesterday #23

Jeeze. Eko Yesterday #25

I think Iran would use a nuclear weapon for defensive purposes like other countries that have nuclear weapons AZProgressive Yesterday #31

YES Skittles Saturday #3

And you know he's been thinking about it.... OGBuzz Saturday #8

Get the minuteman missile out of your eye before you pluck the drone out of their eye Whip-poor-will Saturday #7

If Iran had a nuke, none of this would be happening. BlueTsunami2018 Saturday #9

"Little Rocket Man" over in North Korea agrees 100%. It's all about deterrence. OGBuzz Saturday #13

It's a kind of Faustian Bargain Disaffected Saturday #16

We have gone through this same song and dance when a country we don't like gets a nuke indusurb Saturday #19

100% OGBuzz Saturday #20

It amazes me dpibel Saturday #21

Several Iranian backed terrorist groups have used suicide bombings as a primary tactical tool Melon Yesterday #24

The Ayatollah's never sacrifice themselves 303squadron Yesterday #26

Just google "settler attacks" to find the equivalent. Eko Yesterday #28

It is one thing to use suicide bombers, an entirely different thing to commit to killing your entire country. indusurb Yesterday #29

It's literally doing it right now Melon 8 hrs ago #34

Not advocating at all. I'm just not convinced that Iran was 2 weeks away from turning earth into a nuclear wasteland. OGBuzz 9 hrs ago #33

Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear agreement. Emile Yesterday #27

If crazy people with nukes would instantly use them D_Master81 Yesterday #30

It turns out the Strait was more important Johonny 23 hrs ago #32