Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dickthegrouch

(4,672 posts)
11. I don't understand. Why isn't this a good thing?
Wed May 20, 2026, 01:56 PM
Wednesday

I read that as saying that the bottom half of the current taxpayers (who only contribute about 3% of the total, anyway) should NOT be paying any taxes.

That seems like a good thing to me.

I have previously written that the tax allowance should be variable per district according to housing prices, and other fixed costs in that area. The same $15000(ish) taxation threshold applies across the entire country now, but fixed living costs are highly variable. Federal taxation makes no acknowledgement of that. Perhaps higher wages in those areas make up some of the difference, but ONLY if one is lucky enough to be earning that higher wage. Federal minimum wage is $7.50 an hour. I don't believe there's anywhere in the country that someone could exist (far less live) on that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNBC: Jeff Bezos says bot...»Reply #11