Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ITAL

(1,382 posts)
54. Well, just speaking for myself
Thu May 21, 2026, 12:22 PM
21 hrs ago

It is partly because for some of these people, their wealth is more tied into what they may own rather than cash on hand.

It's sort of like my brother and his wife. She comes from a wealthy family (not billions mind you, but they were all doctors going back a couple of generations and invested early in some big pet food company where they really made money), but my sister-in-law teaches engineering at a University so her salary isn't earth shattering. Practically all of her money is tied up in stocks. On a day to day basis they don't really that much more money than my wife and I do (they take the occasional expensive European vacation, but otherwise nothing would out then as having a lot of cash). BUT, her wealth is growing all the time because it's tied up in whatever her stock broker has them invested in.

I feel like that is the case with at least some wealthy people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeah that sucks FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #1
Maybe he thinks he has the best chance of winning? Ocelot II Wednesday #2
Yeah, that jungle primary is so fucking stupid. FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #4
I hadn't heard many complaints about it until this year MichMan 20 hrs ago #58
Sixty contenders on ballot for governor Sequoia 22 hrs ago #34
Steve Hilton is not going to beat any Democrat here obamanut2012 20 hrs ago #68
He has ads running narrated by Jane Fonda ... LSparkle Wednesday #3
I openly hate all billionaires angrychair Wednesday #5
I see, you openly HATE all billionaires. Abolishinist Wednesday #9
It becomes more nuanced angrychair Yesterday #10
No, it doesn't become more nuanced. FascismIsDeath 22 hrs ago #44
All of them? Disaffected Yesterday #16
All billionaires. angrychair Yesterday #18
What about Ebenezer Scrooge? Sequoia 22 hrs ago #35
However, she is giving large portions away and, Disaffected 22 hrs ago #39
Which is the whole purpose angrychair 22 hrs ago #43
Hording? Cummon man, give at least a little credit. Disaffected 21 hrs ago #50
All due respect angrychair 21 hrs ago #53
I don't think it is reasonable to expect her to Disaffected 20 hrs ago #56
Maybe I'm saying it wrong angrychair 20 hrs ago #60
Here's The Thing: With Taxes, Govt Can Be---Can Be---Fair And..... ColoringFool Yesterday #20
Agreed. nt Disaffected 22 hrs ago #40
Why hate JB Pritzker? MichMan 20 hrs ago #62
I don't comment on him angrychair 20 hrs ago #64
You stated that you hate all billionaires and he falls into that category MichMan 20 hrs ago #70
Nope angrychair 20 hrs ago #73
They certainly hate us FullySupportDems 19 hrs ago #77
Are multimillionaires ok? Jose Garcia 18 hrs ago #81
Not the same thing angrychair 18 hrs ago #84
Yeah, I don't get it either Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #6
I would argue angrychair Wednesday #7
Yeah, that's my rule too- no celebrities or billionaire candidates- ever, period. Nt Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #8
Our Revolution endorsed the billionaire. N/T lapucelle 20 hrs ago #55
seems only fair to provide his reasoning TheProle Yesterday #11
One Can Always Find A Reason When One Changes.... ColoringFool Yesterday #22
TY, snippets from your link... Cha Yesterday #26
This is propaganda angrychair 19 hrs ago #76
I agree with Reich. CoopersDad Yesterday #12
All billionaires are scum angrychair Yesterday #13
And Just The Term "Private Prisons" Should Be Anathema!! TOTALLY.... ColoringFool Yesterday #21
Message auto-removed Name removed 17 hrs ago #88
Not what I'm talking about angrychair 17 hrs ago #89
Message auto-removed Name removed 15 hrs ago #91
Feel free to flame me,.... but FHRRK1 Yesterday #14
It's a tough choice. And I missed the second debate, so there's that. I'll try to watch it. Abolishinist Yesterday #17
Post removed Post removed Yesterday #23
Because WE're Dems for Democracy, Cha Yesterday #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Yesterday #25
Nah. The PEDO, Homicidal Maniac in Cha Yesterday #27
Looks like I missed a moron MustLoveBeagles 22 hrs ago #37
Ya did! Cha 15 hrs ago #90
My speculations: hunter Yesterday #15
That's the way I vote here in TX - TBF 22 hrs ago #33
Reich posted Steyer explaining "Why Tax Cuts for the Rich Are So Stupid" back in 2017. betsuni Yesterday #19
Oh yes, "the purity test", except Cha Yesterday #29
He said that nine years ago angrychair 19 hrs ago #74
FDR was a wealthy man who did right for the poor and disadvantaged. Tim S Yesterday #28
This. SSJVegeta Yesterday #30
I think that is where the confusion angrychair 23 hrs ago #32
Your point is irrefutable. None the less Steyer is not just occasionally doing the right thing SSJVegeta 22 hrs ago #36
To be fair angrychair 22 hrs ago #38
I highly respect your stance. To be clear: SSJVegeta 22 hrs ago #42
Also to be fair angrychair 22 hrs ago #45
He isnt personally giving up his funds but he is funding campaigns that -if successful, would result in him losing his SSJVegeta 20 hrs ago #59
I guess we will see angrychair 20 hrs ago #63
I mean. FDR wasnt quite as rich as Steyer SSJVegeta 20 hrs ago #66
Also just an obvservation SSJVegeta 20 hrs ago #61
Well, that's the rub angrychair 20 hrs ago #71
I think there are one or two good billionaires SSJVegeta 20 hrs ago #72
Like you said, you're not in CA Bobstandard 18 hrs ago #82
My comments are not about Steyer per se angrychair 17 hrs ago #86
A current example is JD Pritzker (gov of Illinois) - TBF 23 hrs ago #31
I'll believe a billionaire actually cares angrychair 22 hrs ago #41
There are some that almost have to be ITAL 21 hrs ago #46
That part angrychair 21 hrs ago #47
Okay ITAL 21 hrs ago #48
They don't have to sell it angrychair 21 hrs ago #49
Well, just speaking for myself ITAL 21 hrs ago #54
Yes and no angrychair 20 hrs ago #57
You're not wrong - example Jeff Bezos first wife TBF 21 hrs ago #51
The other point I would make - TBF 21 hrs ago #52
As long as they weren't of Japanese ancestry MichMan 17 hrs ago #87
We're being handed two not great choices Sympthsical 20 hrs ago #65
Also implicit in my point angrychair 20 hrs ago #67
Agree 100% with you Sympthsical 19 hrs ago #78
My wife and I just voted for Becerra, and we are proud to do so obamanut2012 20 hrs ago #69
My partner and I just voted for Steyer Sympthsical 19 hrs ago #80
Desperation makes for strange bedfellows Redleg 19 hrs ago #75
He's being dragged on JustAnotherGen 19 hrs ago #79
Steyer is legitimately to the left of the other candidates senseandsensibility 18 hrs ago #83
Reich has made a career angrychair 18 hrs ago #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Even Robert Reich is Disa...»Reply #54