General Discussion

Response to angrychair (Reply #13)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

91 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Even Robert Reich is Disappointing Me [View all] angrychair Yesterday OP

Yeah that sucks FoxNewsSucks Yesterday #1

Maybe he thinks he has the best chance of winning? Ocelot II Yesterday #2

Yeah, that jungle primary is so fucking stupid. FoxNewsSucks Yesterday #4

I hadn't heard many complaints about it until this year MichMan 10 hrs ago #58

Sixty contenders on ballot for governor Sequoia 12 hrs ago #34

Steve Hilton is not going to beat any Democrat here obamanut2012 10 hrs ago #68

He has ads running narrated by Jane Fonda ... LSparkle Yesterday #3

I openly hate all billionaires angrychair Yesterday #5

I see, you openly HATE all billionaires. Abolishinist Yesterday #9

It becomes more nuanced angrychair 23 hrs ago #10

No, it doesn't become more nuanced. FascismIsDeath 12 hrs ago #44

All of them? Disaffected 22 hrs ago #16

All billionaires. angrychair 21 hrs ago #18

What about Ebenezer Scrooge? Sequoia 12 hrs ago #35

However, she is giving large portions away and, Disaffected 12 hrs ago #39

Which is the whole purpose angrychair 12 hrs ago #43

Hording? Cummon man, give at least a little credit. Disaffected 11 hrs ago #50

All due respect angrychair 11 hrs ago #53

I don't think it is reasonable to expect her to Disaffected 10 hrs ago #56

Maybe I'm saying it wrong angrychair 10 hrs ago #60

Here's The Thing: With Taxes, Govt Can Be---Can Be---Fair And..... ColoringFool 20 hrs ago #20

Agreed. nt Disaffected 12 hrs ago #40

Why hate JB Pritzker? MichMan 10 hrs ago #62

I don't comment on him angrychair 10 hrs ago #64

You stated that you hate all billionaires and he falls into that category MichMan 10 hrs ago #70

Nope angrychair 10 hrs ago #73

They certainly hate us FullySupportDems 9 hrs ago #77

Are multimillionaires ok? Jose Garcia 8 hrs ago #81

Not the same thing angrychair 8 hrs ago #84

Yeah, I don't get it either Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #6

I would argue angrychair Yesterday #7

Yeah, that's my rule too- no celebrities or billionaire candidates- ever, period. Nt Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #8

Our Revolution endorsed the billionaire. N/T lapucelle 10 hrs ago #55

seems only fair to provide his reasoning TheProle 23 hrs ago #11

One Can Always Find A Reason When One Changes.... ColoringFool 20 hrs ago #22

TY, snippets from your link... Cha 19 hrs ago #26

This is propaganda angrychair 9 hrs ago #76

I agree with Reich. CoopersDad 22 hrs ago #12

All billionaires are scum angrychair 22 hrs ago #13

And Just The Term "Private Prisons" Should Be Anathema!! TOTALLY.... ColoringFool 20 hrs ago #21

Message auto-removed Name removed 7 hrs ago #88

Not what I'm talking about angrychair 7 hrs ago #89

Message auto-removed Name removed 5 hrs ago #91

Feel free to flame me,.... but FHRRK1 22 hrs ago #14

It's a tough choice. And I missed the second debate, so there's that. I'll try to watch it. Abolishinist 22 hrs ago #17

Post removed Post removed 20 hrs ago #23

Because WE're Dems for Democracy, Cha 19 hrs ago #24

Message auto-removed Name removed 19 hrs ago #25

Nah. The PEDO, Homicidal Maniac in Cha 19 hrs ago #27

Looks like I missed a moron MustLoveBeagles 12 hrs ago #37

Ya did! Cha 5 hrs ago #90

My speculations: hunter 22 hrs ago #15

That's the way I vote here in TX - TBF 13 hrs ago #33

Reich posted Steyer explaining "Why Tax Cuts for the Rich Are So Stupid" back in 2017. betsuni 20 hrs ago #19

Oh yes, "the purity test", except Cha 18 hrs ago #29

He said that nine years ago angrychair 9 hrs ago #74

FDR was a wealthy man who did right for the poor and disadvantaged. Tim S 18 hrs ago #28

This. SSJVegeta 18 hrs ago #30

I think that is where the confusion angrychair 13 hrs ago #32

Your point is irrefutable. None the less Steyer is not just occasionally doing the right thing SSJVegeta 12 hrs ago #36

To be fair angrychair 12 hrs ago #38

I highly respect your stance. To be clear: SSJVegeta 12 hrs ago #42

Also to be fair angrychair 12 hrs ago #45

He isnt personally giving up his funds but he is funding campaigns that -if successful, would result in him losing his SSJVegeta 10 hrs ago #59

I guess we will see angrychair 10 hrs ago #63

I mean. FDR wasnt quite as rich as Steyer SSJVegeta 10 hrs ago #66

Also just an obvservation SSJVegeta 10 hrs ago #61

Well, that's the rub angrychair 10 hrs ago #71

I think there are one or two good billionaires SSJVegeta 10 hrs ago #72

Like you said, you're not in CA Bobstandard 8 hrs ago #82

My comments are not about Steyer per se angrychair 7 hrs ago #86

A current example is JD Pritzker (gov of Illinois) - TBF 13 hrs ago #31

I'll believe a billionaire actually cares angrychair 12 hrs ago #41

There are some that almost have to be ITAL 12 hrs ago #46

That part angrychair 11 hrs ago #47

Okay ITAL 11 hrs ago #48

They don't have to sell it angrychair 11 hrs ago #49

Well, just speaking for myself ITAL 11 hrs ago #54

Yes and no angrychair 10 hrs ago #57

You're not wrong - example Jeff Bezos first wife TBF 11 hrs ago #51

The other point I would make - TBF 11 hrs ago #52

As long as they weren't of Japanese ancestry MichMan 7 hrs ago #87

We're being handed two not great choices Sympthsical 10 hrs ago #65

Also implicit in my point angrychair 10 hrs ago #67

Agree 100% with you Sympthsical 9 hrs ago #78

My wife and I just voted for Becerra, and we are proud to do so obamanut2012 10 hrs ago #69

My partner and I just voted for Steyer Sympthsical 9 hrs ago #80

Desperation makes for strange bedfellows Redleg 9 hrs ago #75

He's being dragged on JustAnotherGen 9 hrs ago #79

Steyer is legitimately to the left of the other candidates senseandsensibility 8 hrs ago #83

Reich has made a career angrychair 8 hrs ago #85