Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

angrychair

(12,545 posts)
89. Not what I'm talking about
Thu May 21, 2026, 04:16 PM
Thursday

A billionaire can leverage their vast wealth to influence situations in ways only large governments could at one time.

Even someone with $900 million dollars to their name is not even in the same zip code, even on the same planet, as a billionaire.
Our brains are just not wired to understand it. The amounts of money we are talking about are humbling.
I encounter these same issues when trying to convey astronomical distances between us and other stuff in our galaxy or universe at large.
Did you know that if you set out from Earth in a random direction with no destination in mind, in a straight line, that your chance of encountering another stellar object at random, is so small as to be nearly impossible? No matter how far you traveled or for how long you traveled?
That is analogue to the difference between a person with a million dollars and a person with a billion dollars. While both can be bad, they are not the same in scale.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeah that sucks FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #1
Maybe he thinks he has the best chance of winning? Ocelot II Wednesday #2
Yeah, that jungle primary is so fucking stupid. FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #4
I hadn't heard many complaints about it until this year MichMan Thursday #58
Sixty contenders on ballot for governor Sequoia Thursday #34
Steve Hilton is not going to beat any Democrat here obamanut2012 Thursday #68
He has ads running narrated by Jane Fonda ... LSparkle Wednesday #3
I openly hate all billionaires angrychair Wednesday #5
I see, you openly HATE all billionaires. Abolishinist Wednesday #9
It becomes more nuanced angrychair Thursday #10
No, it doesn't become more nuanced. FascismIsDeath Thursday #44
All of them? Disaffected Thursday #16
All billionaires. angrychair Thursday #18
What about Ebenezer Scrooge? Sequoia Thursday #35
However, she is giving large portions away and, Disaffected Thursday #39
Which is the whole purpose angrychair Thursday #43
Hording? Cummon man, give at least a little credit. Disaffected Thursday #50
All due respect angrychair Thursday #53
I don't think it is reasonable to expect her to Disaffected Thursday #56
Maybe I'm saying it wrong angrychair Thursday #60
Here's The Thing: With Taxes, Govt Can Be---Can Be---Fair And..... ColoringFool Thursday #20
Agreed. nt Disaffected Thursday #40
Why hate JB Pritzker? MichMan Thursday #62
I don't comment on him angrychair Thursday #64
You stated that you hate all billionaires and he falls into that category MichMan Thursday #70
Nope angrychair Thursday #73
They certainly hate us FullySupportDems Thursday #77
Are multimillionaires ok? Jose Garcia Thursday #81
Not the same thing angrychair Thursday #84
Yeah, I don't get it either Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #6
I would argue angrychair Wednesday #7
Yeah, that's my rule too- no celebrities or billionaire candidates- ever, period. Nt Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #8
Our Revolution endorsed the billionaire. N/T lapucelle Thursday #55
seems only fair to provide his reasoning TheProle Thursday #11
One Can Always Find A Reason When One Changes.... ColoringFool Thursday #22
TY, snippets from your link... Cha Thursday #26
This is propaganda angrychair Thursday #76
I agree with Reich. CoopersDad Thursday #12
All billionaires are scum angrychair Thursday #13
And Just The Term "Private Prisons" Should Be Anathema!! TOTALLY.... ColoringFool Thursday #21
Message auto-removed Name removed Thursday #88
Not what I'm talking about angrychair Thursday #89
Message auto-removed Name removed Thursday #91
Feel free to flame me,.... but FHRRK1 Thursday #14
It's a tough choice. And I missed the second debate, so there's that. I'll try to watch it. Abolishinist Thursday #17
Post removed Post removed Thursday #23
Because WE're Dems for Democracy, Cha Thursday #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Thursday #25
Nah. The PEDO, Homicidal Maniac in Cha Thursday #27
Looks like I missed a moron MustLoveBeagles Thursday #37
Ya did! Cha Thursday #90
My speculations: hunter Thursday #15
That's the way I vote here in TX - TBF Thursday #33
Reich posted Steyer explaining "Why Tax Cuts for the Rich Are So Stupid" back in 2017. betsuni Thursday #19
Oh yes, "the purity test", except Cha Thursday #29
He said that nine years ago angrychair Thursday #74
FDR was a wealthy man who did right for the poor and disadvantaged. Tim S Thursday #28
This. SSJVegeta Thursday #30
I think that is where the confusion angrychair Thursday #32
Your point is irrefutable. None the less Steyer is not just occasionally doing the right thing SSJVegeta Thursday #36
To be fair angrychair Thursday #38
I highly respect your stance. To be clear: SSJVegeta Thursday #42
Also to be fair angrychair Thursday #45
He isnt personally giving up his funds but he is funding campaigns that -if successful, would result in him losing his SSJVegeta Thursday #59
I guess we will see angrychair Thursday #63
I mean. FDR wasnt quite as rich as Steyer SSJVegeta Thursday #66
Also just an obvservation SSJVegeta Thursday #61
Well, that's the rub angrychair Thursday #71
I think there are one or two good billionaires SSJVegeta Thursday #72
Like you said, you're not in CA Bobstandard Thursday #82
My comments are not about Steyer per se angrychair Thursday #86
A current example is JD Pritzker (gov of Illinois) - TBF Thursday #31
I'll believe a billionaire actually cares angrychair Thursday #41
There are some that almost have to be ITAL Thursday #46
That part angrychair Thursday #47
Okay ITAL Thursday #48
They don't have to sell it angrychair Thursday #49
Well, just speaking for myself ITAL Thursday #54
Yes and no angrychair Thursday #57
You're not wrong - example Jeff Bezos first wife TBF Thursday #51
The other point I would make - TBF Thursday #52
As long as they weren't of Japanese ancestry MichMan Thursday #87
We're being handed two not great choices Sympthsical Thursday #65
Also implicit in my point angrychair Thursday #67
Agree 100% with you Sympthsical Thursday #78
My wife and I just voted for Becerra, and we are proud to do so obamanut2012 Thursday #69
My partner and I just voted for Steyer Sympthsical Thursday #80
Desperation makes for strange bedfellows Redleg Thursday #75
He's being dragged on JustAnotherGen Thursday #79
Steyer is legitimately to the left of the other candidates senseandsensibility Thursday #83
Reich has made a career angrychair Thursday #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Even Robert Reich is Disa...»Reply #89