Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(134,250 posts)
10. In all my years working with Domestic Violence, and sexual assault,
Sat May 30, 2026, 04:12 AM
19 hrs ago

I never encountered an apologist who changed, felt real remorse. I encountered any number who would say, insincerely, whatever suited the moment. Consequently, I have
a rather jaded view of the subject. Your experience may well be different.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe because he's Jewish and he doesn't want a guy with a Nazi tattoo as a nominee. nycbos Yesterday #1
"Why are we OK with a guy who had an SS tattoo and a person who made apologies for rape?" House of Roberts 23 hrs ago #4
What about his posts blaming women for being raped? He did not niyad 22 hrs ago #6
Maybe you should ask that question of Auchincloss, since it didn't bother him House of Roberts 22 hrs ago #7
Well, I first learned about them on DU. niyad 22 hrs ago #8
OK, when were these posts originated? House of Roberts 22 hrs ago #9
In all my years working with Domestic Violence, and sexual assault, niyad 19 hrs ago #10
The posts were recent. Look it up. yardwork 13 hrs ago #16
Yes. I believe it was for using "retarded", iirc. yorkster 12 hrs ago #28
According to an article by Liz Goodwin in the Washington Post, House of Roberts 10 hrs ago #30
Your googling skills are that poor? yardwork 7 hrs ago #41
I agree that we could have done better, but apparently we aren't going to. So this is the guy. Scrivener7 3 hrs ago #54
I suppose 2013 could be seen as "recent" if one wishes it so. Nt AloeVera 3 hrs ago #55
From what I gleaned in the article I read Mossfern 6 hrs ago #45
I believe that is different messages. House of Roberts 5 hrs ago #46
It is a Nazi tattoo. yardwork 13 hrs ago #15
There's a couple of problems with that EdmondDantes_ 12 hrs ago #25
"Discredited" -you are going to have to provide evidence sarisataka 9 hrs ago #31
Your argument is with the American Prospect. House of Roberts 8 hrs ago #33
Interesting sarisataka 8 hrs ago #34
American Prospect is not 'admitting' anything. House of Roberts 7 hrs ago #36
That is his claim sarisataka 7 hrs ago #39
Fine. Tell it to them. House of Roberts 7 hrs ago #40
But you're citing it which suggests a certain level of belief in it given the rest of your post EdmondDantes_ 5 hrs ago #47
the rising antisemitism in the party is going to bite us in the ass mopinko 16 hrs ago #12
Auchincloss and AIPAC want to look forward and move on Ponietz 23 hrs ago #2
There is no evidence that Epstein worked for Israel. yardwork 13 hrs ago #17
There's ample circumstantial evidence for anyone that cares to look Ponietz 13 hrs ago #21
There's ample circumstantial evidence that Trump is a mutant from outer space. yardwork 13 hrs ago #24
Weak sauce Ponietz 12 hrs ago #26
For God's sake! Look at the war on Iran exactly when they needed a distraction! Ponietz 12 hrs ago #27
Here's the Key from the article Bettie 23 hrs ago #3
That part is from my Wikipedia excerpt, exposing Auchincloss. Glad to see it helped. Celerity 23 hrs ago #5
It's good to expose the truth. yardwork 13 hrs ago #19
We have a centrist problem. Emile 16 hrs ago #11
Hear Hear! (n/t) OldBaldy1701E 16 hrs ago #13
Auchincloss has a controversial past himself TVguyCards 15 hrs ago #14
"Corporate Establishment Centrist Dems Bad Conspiracy AIPAC AIPAC AIPAC: Nice Progressives Oppressed." betsuni 13 hrs ago #18
That's the problem in this thread. yardwork 13 hrs ago #20
Fuck AIPAC. Put that in your cigar and smoke it. Intractable 9 hrs ago #32
Imagine denying AIPAC spending big money in our elections SunImp 7 hrs ago #37
This message was self-deleted by its author Ponietz 4 hrs ago #49
And never forget they used GOP dollars to hamstring us with dead weight like Fetterman Ponietz 30 min ago #57
Utterly predictable. MorbidButterflyTat 6 hrs ago #44
Not Helpful Aepps22 13 hrs ago #22
DURec leftstreet 13 hrs ago #23
This guy votes with party 90% of the time. Emile 11 hrs ago #29
I'm already seeing redditors say AIPAC is responsible for him sexting other women thebigidea 8 hrs ago #35
Many of us predicted that more would come out. yardwork 7 hrs ago #42
K & R. Xavier Breath 7 hrs ago #38
This is an "outrageous attack"? MorbidButterflyTat 6 hrs ago #43
Sing it! yardwork 5 hrs ago #48
The one attacking Platner over his background has a questionable background of his own AZProgressive 3 hrs ago #50
Federal elections and officials affect all of us. RandySF 3 hrs ago #51
Which is why I so hope Auchincloss is defeated in his next Dem primary. Celerity 3 hrs ago #52
Fair enough. RandySF 3 hrs ago #53
Ratioed. lapucelle 3 hrs ago #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AIPAC and Auchincloss: Wh...»Reply #10