Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

my same words... markie Yesterday #1
We used to have.people in office who, despite their flaws, wnylib 22 hrs ago #16
I believe that the founders believed the judiciary would remain independent DFW 19 hrs ago #44
Conservatives counted on that belief... GiqueCee 11 hrs ago #55
The current amount of wealth in the USA, dugog55 9 hrs ago #64
Can recall early in his first term that people kept asking whether he would "rise allegorical oracle 10 hrs ago #59
He wouldn't have stayed in office popsdenver 10 hrs ago #60
Ghandi is often cited as a peaceful protestor with peace being how he attained his goals. However, supporters in2herbs 23 hrs ago #2
No Dorian Gray 22 hrs ago #10
Well, let's hope the Congress that convenes after the midterms has one. Otherwise, PatrickforB 21 hrs ago #26
I'm with you. Joinfortmill 21 hrs ago #30
Well said popsdenver 10 hrs ago #62
Back to basics. TommyT139 5 hrs ago #68
Count me in, too, PatrickforB! calimary 1 hr ago #73
Word! yellow dahlia 21 hrs ago #33
Yes. But Americans have lost their fighting spirit. BlueTsunami2018 5 hrs ago #69
Our founding fathers never believed bob4460 23 hrs ago #3
I'm sure the Founding Fathers never considered the possibility that so many elected officials FakeNoose 23 hrs ago #6
The founders believed that Congressmen would zealously safeguard their own power. Intractable 23 hrs ago #7
No, they sold it. Traitors! For the love of money! Sweet Rosie Red 21 hrs ago #24
Who would believe this? yellow dahlia 21 hrs ago #34
What is the flaw in the constitution? Disaffected 23 hrs ago #4
Yes PatSeg 22 hrs ago #14
FOX NEWS, RINSE, REPEAT. Joinfortmill 21 hrs ago #31
There are fundamental flaws in the constitution Mysterian 20 hrs ago #38
Yeah, I would agree that the electoral college is an anachronism Disaffected 18 hrs ago #46
Yes, I agree PatSeg 9 hrs ago #63
The GOP should homegirl 22 hrs ago #21
The flaw was their belief that congress could not be corrupted Bettie 12 hrs ago #53
The flaw is the Electoral College, responsible for Trump's toehold. maddiemom 5 hrs ago #66
No argument there... nt Disaffected 3 hrs ago #71
The Constitution gives us two ways to remove a president..impeachment and the 25th amendment but.. Deuxcents 23 hrs ago #5
This malaise 22 hrs ago #8
Citizens United created this catastrophe Ponietz 22 hrs ago #9
I think that needs to be the first of several ammendments. Gore1FL 22 hrs ago #13
The Constitution was supposed to be a living document, but the founders never saw the country becoming so large that Karasu 14 hrs ago #51
A Law that would force each and every candidate for public office to Justice matters. 53 min ago #74
Yes, that was arguably one of the worst, Disaffected 18 hrs ago #47
SCOTUS needs three impeachment votes as well RainCaster 11 hrs ago #57
Add 4 more justices--make it 13!! Dems should run on it!! (Even if it's hard to do) ! Ars Longa 22 hrs ago #11
More than that RetiredParatrooper 12 hrs ago #52
The constitution isn't the problem. It's a assheads interpreting it. n/t SpankMe 22 hrs ago #12
Or ignoring it PatSeg 22 hrs ago #20
Rage stage left 22 hrs ago #15
It's not The Constitution, it is a spineless Republican Congress and a corrupt LoisB 22 hrs ago #17
It's the Constitution Cirsium 18 hrs ago #49
The 4 states Cirsium 22 hrs ago #18
And these 4 states contribute little to the national economy Blue Owl 18 hrs ago #45
Understood Cirsium 18 hrs ago #48
Kick dalton99a 22 hrs ago #19
It's you'll Republican... richdj25 22 hrs ago #22
Corrupt conservative reprehensible republicans. Festivito 22 hrs ago #23
"A nation that will not enforce its laws has no claim to the respect and allegiance of its people." progressoid 21 hrs ago #25
That's a signature line to keep Ponietz 20 hrs ago #42
Amen to that Joinfortmill 21 hrs ago #27
the CRAZY part Skittles 21 hrs ago #28
Trump technically was INELIGIBLE to have run in 2024. maddiemom 2 hrs ago #72
He was, and the courts turned a blind eye to it. Some even admitted he committed an insurrection and STILL allowed him Karasu 41 min ago #76
Sounds like me. OAITW r.2.0 21 hrs ago #29
Me, too. hamsterjill 20 hrs ago #35
Should have been more checks put in place the first time he was elected!!! We dropped the ball!!!! Pisces 21 hrs ago #32
Spectacular own goals for the history books Ponietz 20 hrs ago #43
The English language to the rescue. hay rick 20 hrs ago #36
So True, no matter how hard Cha 20 hrs ago #37
What would have stopped him from becoming President the first time? Jedi Guy 20 hrs ago #39
A better press might have done it. Morbius 20 hrs ago #40
Maybe, I guess. Jedi Guy 20 hrs ago #41
We need constitutional law/civics and mental health/sanity requirements for political candidates. Karasu 15 hrs ago #50
As long as you keep allowing the thing that has constantly created the corruption and degradation... OldBaldy1701E 11 hrs ago #54
If we don't try them, and if we don't hang them, then we're just enabling tyranny to continue or to happen again. Efilroft Sul 11 hrs ago #56
That's because there are over 50. ananda 11 hrs ago #58
That last sentence in the post is so spot on. moreland01 10 hrs ago #61
Protections, protections, and more protections, Magoo48 6 hrs ago #65
I would add "despair" to that list because trump is getting away with so much and destroying so much in the process. Martin68 5 hrs ago #67
Could? No, they will, even if we do manage to end this fascist charade. Karasu 42 min ago #75
Unstack The SC too! czarjak 4 hrs ago #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"There is no word to adeq...»Reply #63