I appreciate you.
Agree with him 1000%. This has been a chief complaint I've hammered over and over. The party is too beholden to the consultant class, and the messaging constantly sounds like none of these people have ever met an actual voter. Sure they've focus-grouped, tested slogans, done marketing research, etc. etc. Then entire campaigns get shaped around this.
But there's no sense that these politicians or the people they surround themselves with have spent more than 10 minutes around people who exist outside of their political bubble. That five minute photo op in a diner ain't gonna do it.
And he touches on another incoming problem. The barrier to entry is going to get worse now that Millennials on down have social media histories. If we want candidates who understand voters - who understand flesh and blood humans - they're probably not perfectly curated political bots.
Perfectly curated political people are probably the ones you don't want in there. That means they're playing the game, navigating the power structures, already lining up their donors and their machine favors.
The result of that is not people who want meaningful reform. It almost never is. The result is the much vaunted incrementalism, which is really just, "How few crumbs can I give you to shut you up and re-elect me?" And just because there are oftentimes enough sycophantic people who see politicians as celebrities they're fans of instead of servants who should earn their power, it doesn't make it a great system.
= new reply since forum marked as read