Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Moostache

(11,347 posts)
31. I sympathize with this 100%...
Mon Jun 22, 2026, 11:41 AM
Yesterday

I manage a team of research chemists and microbiologists. The equipment and laboratory environment cannot be taken home or made portable, to do this job, people simply must be on-site. The compromise that we have reached is to allow personnel 1 day of WFH (work from home) per two week cycle, provided that their on-site assignments are either completed or covered by on-site team members / co-workers.

This system requires that 1) I am in contact with my direct reports and their projects daily and 2) that we establish an environment or trust and comradery that allows people to know they have support when needed. My group loves the arrangement and the flexibility it offers them and productivity has not been harmed at all. My biggest obstacle is the one that is beyond my control at all - salaries and benefits in an inflationary time feels WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY worse than just small COLA raises and an annual bonus should.

I cannot change the corporate compensation model and I cannot do anything more to increase compensation, I just remain honest with each individual and do the best I can to champion them based on the achievements hit during every review period.

Oh, and for those who have bad managers I am sorry, but for those who have good managers they already know the primary role of the manager (and it is largely thankless the closer to manufacturing you drift) - it is you manager's primary duty to run interference and take blame for everything that goes wrong and pass on credit (up AND down the chain) for anything that goes well. Bad managers invert these responsibilities and do not understand the assignment. Do I "work" as hard as my reports? Of course not, but that's the point - my primary responsibility is to maintain their ability to hit targets and make deadlines, to keep things moving smoothly and to provide a single point of contact to explain when things are not smooth. The better you are at this role, the less it appears you have to do to those outside the actual team or project, and the worse you are, the more your team feels the heat.

WE also implemented access to the 9-8-80 working model (4 x [9] hour days weekly [72 hrs]; plus 1 x [8] very other Friday [8 /80 total hrs.]) to marry up to the `1 day a week WFH access. In effect, this makes every weekend a 3-day weekend and allows my team to stretch out their vacation usage and schedule things like doctor's visits and car repairs in a better manner. The one restriction is the WFH day cannot be the Monday after a scheduled Friday off... those absences require use of a day of ETO still.

The bottom line is always, if a business WANTS to treat employees well, its always POSSIBLE... but weak people make weak leaders and they make weak decisions all the time. Sad but true.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Absolutely bucolic_frolic Yesterday #1
some managers have limited capabilities; desk checks is one of them. dem4decades Yesterday #2
Hey, it's not easy to sit in your office and track worker's bathroom trips Orrex Yesterday #5
Or snag an unfortunate employee just passing by your office YodaMom2 Yesterday #25
Sometimes I'm gone to the bathroom so long, the inevitable question arises: True Dough 18 hrs ago #52
I've had managers in corporate settings whose only discernible function was to call meetings and waste everyone's time. sop Yesterday #3
... Wednesdays Yesterday #38
Republicans love home schooling but don't want their workers to work from home?? Yeah, there's a in2herbs Yesterday #4
indoctrinate their offspring. no outside thoughts dave99 Yesterday #20
"No outside thoughts" Shipwack Yesterday #28
Yep! Ego. ZDU Yesterday #6
Clearly, There Are Some Jobs... ProfessorGAC Yesterday #7
was this article about you ? dave99 Yesterday #22
Huh? ProfessorGAC Yesterday #27
I appreciate this article; its thesis was clear before the pandemic even ended Orrex Yesterday #8
The movie, Office Space, comes to mind. Sequoia Yesterday #32
Definitely! Orrex Yesterday #39
Having a narcissist boss is awful. I got to experience it sadly. Oneironaut Yesterday #9
So many CEOs are sociopaths. My boss was the owner's son and a real SOB. OMGWTF 23 hrs ago #42
"Owners son" - No words are more terrifying. Ugh! Oneironaut 21 hrs ago #44
The most efficient business model is multigraincracker Yesterday #10
Employee owned businesses don't have a CEO? MichMan Yesterday #19
They don't have overpaid CEOs multigraincracker Yesterday #33
Only $3.4 million MichMan Yesterday #34
Does he need an assistant manager at half price? DFW 15 hrs ago #57
In my experience, it was also about trust nuxvomica Yesterday #11
Well, I did have employees who shirked work from home. Easterncedar 19 hrs ago #49
When people are evaluated on their work Pinback 8 hrs ago #60
We could have used more like you! Easterncedar 7 hrs ago #62
It's all about control. n/t area51 Yesterday #12
That, and they have long term leases on Brick and Mortar Bristlecone Yesterday #13
Might be more to it. Business analysts saw that a CRE meltdown could result in a broad financial crisis lostnfound Yesterday #14
Great. Now we have found out that some of our Bosses are like Donald Trump. chouchou Yesterday #15
My kid had, and still has, the option of working from home, but he didn't like it, so he went back to his office at Raftergirl Yesterday #16
Yes, personally I prefer a hybrid schedule TexasBushwhacker Yesterday #21
my condolences on his touch of narcissism dave99 Yesterday #29
Well... Raftergirl Yesterday #36
Your Son Sounds Like a Winner To Me! alcuno 7 hrs ago #61
In a different situation, I would have been like your kid RandomNumbers 20 hrs ago #48
Can only speak for myself. In 2012 Joinfortmill Yesterday #17
I have 3 family members working from home Tree Lady Yesterday #26
The Galley master needs people to whip. Old Crank Yesterday #18
Watching people drive in LA traffic to the office Johonny Yesterday #23
It depends on the working environment MichMan Yesterday #24
I sympathize with this 100%... Moostache Yesterday #31
Work from home intelpug 16 hrs ago #56
Ye Gods! Does this fit!!! slightlv Yesterday #30
I disagree with the premise of this genxlib Yesterday #35
Reductive analysis. maxsolomon Yesterday #37
If I remember your profile genxlib Yesterday #40
I worked from home, exclusively since 2002 forthemiddle 23 hrs ago #41
Illustrates the disconnect between the blue collar working class and elites MichMan 22 hrs ago #43
Covid change the work environment LogDog75 21 hrs ago #45
Most mid-level managers add absolutely nothing to organizations. waterwatcher123 20 hrs ago #46
T-rump, narcissist extraordinaire, ordered federal remote workers back to offices. Wicked Blue 20 hrs ago #47
Technology in the 90s made remote work possible. I used to work at home a lot, but still OAITW r.2.0 19 hrs ago #50
Turf. Telework means employees are on their home turf. underpants 18 hrs ago #51
My experience frequently mirrored the scenarios described in the article, BUT Pinback 18 hrs ago #53
Don't forget the real estate incentives. paulkienitz 17 hrs ago #54
They also think you're not actually working Figarosmom 16 hrs ago #55
My husband is lucky Jilly_in_VA 9 hrs ago #58
'New Research'? Where the hell has this person been? OldBaldy1701E 8 hrs ago #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Real Reason Bosses Wa...»Reply #31