General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 2,305 killed by Obama in drone strikes in Pakistan by my count [View all]quaker bill
(8,264 posts)Some of them were in Pakistan at the time. I don't think drones open any more possibilities. They are slower and easier to shoot down than piloted aircraft, given the Pakistani's wanted to shoot them down. If they wanted to, they certainly could shoot them down, so I am pretty sure they don't.
Why is it that drones don't provoke a revolution there? They are apparently quite deadly and seem only vaguely different than cruise missles, just cheaper for us to use. Perhaps it is because we are using them to kill people that they don't want to start a revolution over?
To my mind, death is death, no one way of causing it is more or less moral than another. I find it all quite immoral and don't find using drones to make it any worse. I don't find where a person is standing on the political map to make it any different. Death is death.
I don't get the drone thing as any worse than any other means of doing it. Giving them a chance to shoot back does not make killing them any more moral.