Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(24,472 posts)
5. I said "some"
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 03:25 PM
Yesterday

Some of the worst are Brian Tyler Cohen (clickbait merchant) and Meidas Touch (outrage farmers) - they aren’t any more independent than the legacy media you disdain, they just have different agendas and masters.

Marc Elias of Democracy Docket is a frequent guest on MSNOW, as are some of the other folks from sources on your list.

In many, but not all cases, these so-called “independent” News sources prioritize clicks and engagement over informing their audiences- that’s how they stay in business, and we should never forget they are businesses just like the big legacy media outlets.

Legal AF is a fine source for information and analysis of legislative and court related news; so are LawFare, emptywheel and the Strict Scrutiny podcast, which also features legal experts who are frequent guests on MSNOW.

I think it is dangerous to reject all legacy media sources out of hand, and may even be more dangerous to blindly accept “independent” News sources are preferable over legacy media, especially since those lines are becoming increasingly blurred.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You have to subscribe in ...»Reply #5