Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
22. There is actually a theory (the "Donohue-Levitt Hypothesis") that legal abortion reduces crime.
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 11:25 PM
Jan 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legalized_abortion_and_crime_effect

The effect of legalized abortion on crime (sometimes referred to as the Donohue-Levitt hypothesis) is the theory that legal abortion reduces crime. Proponents of the theory generally argue that since unwanted children are more likely to become criminals and that an inverse correlation is observed between the availability of abortion and subsequent crime. Moreover, children born under these conditions are usually less fortunate as enough preparation was not put in place for their birth and upbringing. In particular, it is argued that the legalization of abortion in the United States, largely due to the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade, has reduced crime in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Opponents generally reject these statistics, and argue that abortion has negative effects on society or decrease in crime is brought about in other ways.

.......

The 1972 Rockefeller Commission on Population and the American Future is one of the better known early versions of this claim, although it was not the first. The Commission cited research purporting that the children of women denied an abortion “turned out to have been registered more often with psychiatric services, engaged in more antisocial and criminal behavior, and have been more dependent on public assistance.” A 1966 study by Hans Forssman and Inga Thuwe was cited by the Rockefeller Commission and is probably the first serious empirical research on this topic. They studied the children of 188 women who were denied abortions from 1939 to 1941 at the hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden. They compared these unwanted children to another group – the next child born after each of the unwanted children at the hospital. The unwanted children were more likely to grow up in adverse conditions, such as having divorced parents or being raised in foster homes and were more likely to become delinquents and engaged in crime. Supreme Court Justice Blackmun opinion in Roe v. Wade also referenced the social and private problems "of bringing a child into a family already unable, psychologically and otherwise, to care for it."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R - nt Ohio Joe Jan 2013 #1
k&r with thanks uppityperson Jan 2013 #2
Speaking of abortion.... PennsylvaniaMatt Jan 2013 #3
I am pro-abortion. it's a moral choice that liberates women, saves lives and PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #4
But the key word you used is "choice".... PennsylvaniaMatt Jan 2013 #5
ok, but you said that nobody is. I am. it's a medical procedure. PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #6
I see what you're saying.... PennsylvaniaMatt Jan 2013 #7
I don't like the implication that fully supporting and/or having one is shameful PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #8
Fully supporting or having an abortion is NOT shameful PennsylvaniaMatt Jan 2013 #9
I understand where the poster is getting at gollygee Jan 2013 #15
Exactly. PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #18
That's like saying that you're "pro-mastectomy". Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #11
I disagree. PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #14
"Abortion rates are fairly low and have steadily declined since 1997" is the second bullet point Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #16
+1 MotherPetrie Jan 2013 #20
I'm pro-mastectomy and pro-abortion. Both are blessings to women who need them. SunSeeker Jan 2013 #27
Their is a +1 on the Pro Abortion here. Lady Freedom Returns Jan 2013 #10
wow. PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #12
I'm pro-abortion. RudynJack Jan 2013 #17
I would bet that more women are coaxed or guilted into childbirth than abortion. PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #19
Exactly. RudynJack Jan 2013 #21
bullshit, indeed. there are laws against "abortion coercion", but not coerced childbirth. PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #23
There is actually a theory (the "Donohue-Levitt Hypothesis") that legal abortion reduces crime. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #22
absolutely astonishing that women can manage their own health care, their own bodies, without niyad Jan 2013 #13
About those abortion rates going down... TreasonousBastard Jan 2013 #24
the point is: decriminalizing has not caused an increase PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #25
That too... TreasonousBastard Jan 2013 #26
Good point. The best way to reduce abortion is by making contraception widely available Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #29
This thread is not about reducing abortion, it's about reproductive choice. PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #30
The poster I was replying to had "abortion rates going down" in the post title. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #31
It's the second time you've tried to twist it into that. PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #32
I would prefer that my daughters use contraception than get pregnant and have an abortion. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #33
this article isn't about what you want for your daughters PeaceNikki Jan 2013 #34
May I offer my humble and sincere apologies for straying so far off-topic. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #35
K&R SunSeeker Jan 2013 #28
I don't agree with everyone on here overthehillvet Jan 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The benefits of decrimina...»Reply #22